Usyk and Lomachenko are two completely different levels of fighters. It is true that Davis, who has 1 good fighter on his resume, is not ready for Lomachenko.
There isn't much to be "ready" for Usyk, who is sloppy as hell and not in the same level P4P that Lomachenko is. If you think Davis is ready for Lomachenko, you are on drugs, or drunk. Not saying that Gassiev will dispatch of Usyk, just saying Gassiev has it easier with Usyk, who isn't all that in my eyes, than Davis has it with Lomachenko, who is pretty damn great and has twice as much am fights as Davis.
We're talking about an A+ level fighter in Lomachenko. Usyk, maybe a B level, idk and idc what he is, but it sure as hell not an A level fighter.
Usyk and Lomachenko are two completely different levels of fighters. It is true that Davis, who has 1 good fighter on his resume, is not ready for Lomachenko.
There isn't much to be "ready" for Usyk, who is sloppy as hell and not in the same level P4P that Lomachenko is. If you think Davis is ready for Lomachenko, you are on drugs, or drunk. Not saying that Gassiev will dispatch of Usyk, just saying Gassiev has it easier with Usyk, who isn't all that in my eyes, than Davis has it with Lomachenko, who is pretty damn great and has twice as much am fights as Davis.
We're talking about an A+ level fighter in Lomachenko. Usyk, maybe a B level, idk and idc what he is, but it sure as hell not an A level fighter.
So what usyk isn't as good p4p as lomo? No one is. Dosen't justify him ducking lomachenko. And gassiev barely has any amateur experience. It puts them both on a level playing field. another fan who dosen't want to see the best fights.
So what usyk isn't as good p4p as lomo? No one is. Dosen't justify him ducking lomachenko. And gassiev barely has any amateur experience. It puts them both on a level playing field. another fan who dosen't want to see the best fights.
How is Davis vs Lomachenko, "the best fights"?
Davis is 23, and largely inexperienced at the top level, with one good win in Pedraza.
I hate how in boxingscene, to a group of fans, "best" fights means when one guy will be the clear favorite to win.
Wait until Davis gets more experience at the top level before you call a fight vs Lomachenko the "best fights".
Its "the best fights" because Davis might be the second or third best fighter at 130.
Right, in the very loaded 130. I know why you guys want Lomachenko vs Davis, it's obvious. Forget that Davis has 1 good win, and Lomachenko has 5 good wins. Let's put him in there now, catch him while he's young and inexperienced, rather than in his prime.
Comment