The Chris John v JMM fight isn't the robbery that people make it out to be. Probably just people that have never even watched the fight, just repeating what they read on forums.
It was a very close fight, John was the fresher of the two towards the end and probably took the "Championship rounds". JMM did get some points deducted for low blows, twice in fact. one of the times was justified though if i remember correctly.
It was a close fight for sure, it was one of them that could've gone either way, plenty of rounds that weren't easy to score. Anybody that says it was a robbery probably never even saw it.
It was a very close fight, John was the fresher of the two towards the end and probably took the "Championship rounds". JMM did get some points deducted for low blows, twice in fact. one of the times was justified though if i remember correctly.
It was a close fight for sure, it was one of them that could've gone either way, plenty of rounds that weren't easy to score. Anybody that says it was a robbery probably never even saw it.
At people calling robbery. I'm sure they just hear someone say it and just repeat it without even watching the fight.
Comment