Apology accepted. However, you made another error so to speak in your apology.
It wasn't neccessarily a matter of choosing to defend the IBF over the WBA on Joshua's part.
The IBF mandatory was due before the WBA mandatory became due. Therefore, if Joshua had chosen to defend the WBA first, he would have risked getting stripped by the IBF, and we all know how strict the IBF is with regards to following it's own rules (unlike the other orgs).
I'm pointing this out because you seem to be trying to imply that Joshua was ducking Ortiz by 'choosing' the IBF over the WBA.
It wasn't neccessarily a matter of choosing to defend the IBF over the WBA on Joshua's part.
The IBF mandatory was due before the WBA mandatory became due. Therefore, if Joshua had chosen to defend the WBA first, he would have risked getting stripped by the IBF, and we all know how strict the IBF is with regards to following it's own rules (unlike the other orgs).
I'm pointing this out because you seem to be trying to imply that Joshua was ducking Ortiz by 'choosing' the IBF over the WBA.
Comment