The Difference between Spence and Golovkin (honest assessment)
Collapse
-
-
Peterson is OK but old and never been great...
Brook went life and death with Carson Jones and beat an OK fighter in Porter... and just came back from a lost to GGG where he had a broken eye socket... yet he had some success.
Thurman certainly isn't as good as Spence for me, but he's got the tools to last 12.Comment
-
What a fail thread. I came in here hoping for honesty and instead got bs and hypotheticals......
"Thurman" lol what a fail.Comment
-
Both have a lot of KOs, but the difference is that, Spence can decisively stop the other best champions in his division (Brook, Thurman), while GGG cannot (Jacobs, Canelo).
In other words, Spence is able to distinguish himself from the rest of his division like a SPECIAL fighter, while GGG went life and death when he stepped up in competition.
So, P4P wise, Spence > GGG.
No agenda here, just an honest observation.....Comment
-
But Golovkin already ruined Brook before Spence fought him so that isnt clear at all
We can say this if Spence is able to stop thurman, otherwise notComment
Comment