The Difference between Spence and Golovkin (honest assessment)
Collapse
-
-
Of course he has a chance. He has power and boxing skills enough to mean he doesn't get stopped...
Peterson is OK but old and never been great...
Brook went life and death with Carson Jones and beat an OK fighter in Porter... and just came back from a lost to GGG where he had a broken eye socket... yet he had some success.
Thurman certainly isn't as good as Spence for me, but he's got the tools to last 12.Comment
-
What a fail thread. I came in here hoping for honesty and instead got bs and hypotheticals......
"Thurman" lol what a fail.Comment
-
Wishing Spence all the best and hoping he gets the opportunities Golovkin didn't always get, Spence is a superb fighter and deserves all the credit he's earned. I don't really feel any need to compare the two, but if I did I'd suggest waiting til Time has had it's say on Errol's career though... to date he has one top class win.Both have a lot of KOs, but the difference is that, Spence can decisively stop the other best champions in his division (Brook, Thurman), while GGG cannot (Jacobs, Canelo).
In other words, Spence is able to distinguish himself from the rest of his division like a SPECIAL fighter, while GGG went life and death when he stepped up in competition.
So, P4P wise, Spence > GGG.
No agenda here, just an honest observation.....Comment
-
But Golovkin already ruined Brook before Spence fought him so that isnt clear at all
We can say this if Spence is able to stop thurman, otherwise notComment
Comment