The Difference between Spence and Golovkin (honest assessment)

[Robbie Barrett]

Spence already beat better fighters.

WW Brook >>>>>> Jacobs.
Peterson >>>>> Lemieux.

You can clearly see Spence is better than Golovkin at almost everything. Speed, combinations, variety of punches, footwork, defence.


Spence>>>>>>>>>>>>>Golovkin

[boliodogs]

I'll bet the house that Spence stops Thurman. You can bet on Thurman.

Put your money where your mouth is or stfu.

Do you expect him to bet you on a fight that may never happen? Do you expect him to bet money with an unknown stranger? Get real. Maybe you should stfu. He never said Spence would lose. He just said real fights happen in the ring and not in your mind and that is the undeniable truth.

[.!WAR MIKEY!.]

Spence also already KO'd bradley too. I saw that fight in my head yesterday. Add it to the list please OP

[Sledgeweather17]

Apples and organges. P4P JACOBS AND CANELO ARE A LEVEL ABOVE BROOK PETERSON AND ALGERI. What an absurd assessment. Not too mention spence fight night weight is almost the same as ggg's. LMA0.

Jacobs is a level above Brook? This some kind of joke? Jacobs is a chinny bum who has never even been a world champion (Don't tell be bowt no WBA REGULAR belt).

Everyone thought that Brook was the best welterweight before Spence stopped him, but now that he did yawl wana claim Runtime and Showtime (who Brook beat better than Thurman) are better than Brook?

[Bjl12]

Both have a lot of KOs, but the difference is that, Spence can decisively stop the other best champions in his division (Brook, Thurman), while GGG cannot (Jacobs, Canelo).

In other words, Spence is able to distinguish himself from the rest of his division like a SPECIAL fighter, while GGG went life and death when he stepped up in competition.

So, P4P wise, Spence > GGG.

No agenda here, just an honest observation.....

Yet Spence hasn't stepped up in competition yet...

Nice "honest" observation, jackass

[_Maxi]

Both have a lot of KOs, but the difference is that, Spence can decisively stop the other best champions in his division (Brook, Thurman), while GGG cannot (Jacobs, Canelo).

In other words, Spence is able to distinguish himself from the rest of his division like a SPECIAL fighter, while GGG went life and death when he stepped up in competition.

So, P4P wise, Spence > GGG.

No agenda here, just an honest observation.....

1) Was Spence fighting heavier guys? Spence is a big WW.
2) Spence was able to land these fights while in his prime.
3) Are you crediting Spence for stopping Thurman when the fight didn't even happen? LMAO!

[_Maxi]

Spence already beat better fighters.

WW Brook >>>>>> Jacobs.
Peterson >>>>> Lemieux.

You can clearly see Spence is better than Golovkin at almost everything. Speed, combinations, variety of punches, footwork, defence.


Spence>>>>>>>>>>>>>Golovkin

Golovkin beat Canelo as well, don't forget.

[Robbie Barrett]

Golovkin beat Canelo as well, don't forget.

I think you'll find he didn't

[_Maxi]

I think you'll find he didn't

I think you'll only find 10% of people that think he didn't win that fight
"The uppercuts he will eat tho".

[Robbie Barrett]

I think you'll only find 10% of people that think he didn't win that fight
"The uppercuts he will eat tho".

He did eat uppercuts.

He ate a lot more big punches than Canelo. In fact the only punch you were able to find of any note from Golovkin was a shot to the back of the head.

Before the fight - Golovkin has great footwork, Canelo is cement footed.

After the fight - Canelo ran.


Proving Golovins footwork like him is overrated.

Golovkin couldn't land anything other than a weak jab that was so weak Canelo didn't even bother trying to avoid most of the time.


Golovkin was making Canelo look like Mayweather.