What "evidence" is there Pacquaio is on roids?
Collapse
-
-
that was a quote from floyd lol. just goes to show how ******ed he is, and the fact that his fans eat that up and ran with it.Comment
-
Comment
-
After 10 pages, the "evidence" is:
-refused the cut off date
-because Paulie said so
-he got a big a** head
-he got back acne
-his punch output was high (even though he was supposedly fighting punching bag zombies)
-he worked with ariza (who also was never found to be guilty of anything and also who Floyd happened to pick up and work with after being the one who's accusing ariza for being dirty, yet he signs him on)
I'm not seeing anything concrete
ariza had a fighter test positive for diuretics. curiously enough, it was rios when he fought pacquiao.Comment
-
The evidence is there and you will admit it if you are a nuetral boxing fan or don’t like Manny. If you hate Floyd and/or like Manny, you will pretend you don’t see any evidence.
When JMM said he would test if manny did before their 4th fight, Manny decided he didn’t want to test. The TS and others justify his refusal to test when Floyd asked for reasons we all know.
Can’t justify the 2nd refusal. Once is an accident, twice is a trend.
Judge that the same way you do the IV.
so there's evidence that floyd was on PEDs?Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I was telling that poster they should feel the same about the validity of the "evidence" of the IV as they do the "evidence" of the 2 refusals.
It all comes down to how you judge the 2 refusals to test. If you give Manny the benefit of the doubt, fine with me. If you judge it like the court system does a refusal to take a DUI breathylyzer, then fine with me.Comment
-
Besides the fact that he initially refused to allow Floyd to make demands not specified within the boxing commission and do something outside of the set rules, what other "evidence/facts" is there that Pacquiao was using steroids?
If you think about it, his last ko should've been Ricky. (Cotto looked like he could've at least finished the fight had Kenny not stepped in). Even that Hatton knock out was due to all the ducks lining up (close to the end of a round/after a weak lazy jab and not seeing a punch coming-perfect scenario). Manny was never a 1 punch ko guy, he always broke you down with punch after punch after punch.
Him "not knocking people out in years" is pretty dumb since he's been fighting guys who are a lot bigger than he is and who he really shouldn't even have been fighting.
So what else is there that he was roiding.
The only other thing I can think of is Freddy going on camera saying he didn't know what Ariza was giving him, but was Ariza ever caught/charged with anything and did anyone ever prove what he was giving Manny had any form of PED?
The only thing that could be suggested was that he was too good
Floyd knew that and that is why he came out with the PEDs excuse, because Pacquiao was just too good.Comment
-
I was telling that poster they should feel the same about the validity of the "evidence" of the IV as they do the "evidence" of the 2 refusals.
It all comes down to how you judge the 2 refusals to test. If you give Manny the benefit of the doubt, fine with me. If you judge it like the court system does a refusal to take a DUI breathylyzer, then fine with me.
If you have an accident and the other driver gets out and says take this test and you refuse how does the court judge it?Comment
Comment