WBA,WBC,IBF=Undisputed Champ?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TheEvilSaint
    I Dub Thee UNFORGIVEN
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2005
    • 6713
    • 228
    • 210
    • 13,450

    #21
    having the WBC, WBA, and IBF titles, you can call urself the undisputed champion.

    but if you hold those and the WBO belt, there is no way anyone can question you being the undisputed champion.

    dont give me this IBA, NABF, IBC, and all this other bull****.

    Comment

    • Built 2 Last
      WBC Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • May 2006
      • 535
      • 43
      • 49
      • 6,885

      #22
      ^ having ne belt is a gud thing


      but the main four which are WBC, WBA, WBO and IBF is being the undisputed chmapion

      ^^ the 1st person 2 eva hav all 4 was bernard hopkins...seriously...look it up on boxrec...

      u c ppl hav belts..ppl hav more than 4 like roy jones but roy jones didnt hav all 4 main ones...even lewis didnt hav the mina four..he only had 3 n few other ****ty ones

      Comment

      • deliveryman
        Your token white guy
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2006
        • 7592
        • 362
        • 178
        • 15,510

        #23
        Originally posted by Built 2 Last
        ^ having ne belt is a gud thing


        but the main four which are WBC, WBA, WBO and IBF is being the undisputed chmapion

        ^^ the 1st person 2 eva hav all 4 was bernard hopkins...seriously...look it up on boxrec...

        u c ppl hav belts..ppl hav more than 4 like roy jones but roy jones didnt hav all 4 main ones...even lewis didnt hav the mina four..he only had 3 n few other ****ty ones
        Is that suppose to mean something?? Considering that the WBO was created just 16 years ago............

        All the great champions of the past didn't have a chance to win it.

        Comment

        • Built 2 Last
          WBC Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • May 2006
          • 535
          • 43
          • 49
          • 6,885

          #24
          ^ gud point...but look at roy jones jr...he had all the best apart frm one..he had like 7 but didnt get the 4 main ones...u can 50 belts for all i care cus if u dnt hav the main 4 u ant got ****

          Comment

          • mECHsLAVE
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2005
            • 1419
            • 137
            • 105
            • 7,736

            #25
            Originally posted by Built 2 Last
            ^ gud point...but look at roy jones jr...he had all the best apart frm one..he had like 7 but didnt get the 4 main ones...u can 50 belts for all i care cus if u dnt hav the main 4 u ant got ****
            All of Roy's except one were paper, though. Michalczewski unified the WBO, WBA and IBF LHW titles, to become undisputed and those belts had long reigning champions and the WBC had recently declared a champ to their vacant belt who was not a part of the unification with the other three champions. The WBA and IBF were then immediately stripped from Michalczewski (the same week he won them) and then Roy won the vacated belts. So Roy was never technically undisputed. But that's a whole nother thread...

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP