Loma once again disses GGG performance vs Canelo!

[HarvardBlue]

Lomachenko is right.

I thought Golovkin won but he didn't do the things he needed to do to get a definitive win. Canelo actually seem to have a game plan, even if a lot of it involved laying in the ropes.

[Regulus]

Lomachenko is right.

I thought Golovkin won but he didn't do the things he needed to do to get a definitive win. Canelo actually seem to have a game plan, even if a lot of it involved laying in the ropes.

Lomachenko should shut his little twinkle-toes ass up.

He just fought TWO smaller fighters back to back...and the guy he fought before them wasn't worth a ****.

As for Canelo

He can't stay off the ropes regardless the opponent.
He just can't hold the center of the ring.

I think GGG won as well.

[Madison Boxing]

Loma didn't squeak by Walters or draw with Rigo (a smaller fighter) and MarGGGarito did draw with a small fighter and squeak by DJ.

Loma can say w/e the fuck he wants

just dont see why hes got to slag off a guy whos not even in his weight category. And theres more question marks regarding lomachenko then people think, hes far from unbeatable as salido showed. I know hes improved since then but i doubt hes gone from that to being invincible in that short space of time.

[Regulus]

just dont see why hes got to slag off a guy whos not even in his weight category. And theres more question marks regarding lomachenko then people think, hes far from unbeatable as salido showed. I know hes improved since then but i doubt hes gone from that to being invincible in that short space of time.

We finally agree on something.

Loma should keep GGG out of his mouth.

[Redd Foxx]

Honestly, it's just a sensible opinion. I feel the same. I thought Golovkin won only because Canelo let up on him. Golovkin looked very basic, but slow and steady won the race. Canelo looked the more capable boxer. He just made some ****** choices. He's lucky he didn't flat out lose because of it.

Really sad that people have to bash Loma for having a sensible opinion.

[Regulus]

Honestly, it's just a sensible opinion. I feel the same. I thought Golovkin won only because Canelo let up on him. Golovkin looked very basic, but slow and steady won the race. Canelo looked the more capable boxer. He just made some ****** choices. He's lucky he didn't flat out lose because of it.

.

The guy scurrying backwards is not the one that let up.

[Redd Foxx]

.

The guy scurrying backwards is not the one that let up.

So, moving backwards is what then??.... Pressure? You are a fking idiot.

[Bjl12]

just dont see why hes got to slag off a guy whos not even in his weight category. And theres more question marks regarding lomachenko then people think, hes far from unbeatable as salido showed. I know hes improved since then but i doubt hes gone from that to being invincible in that short space of time.

In his 2nd pro fight against the most crooked referee in boxing he got mugged, low blowed, held, and all around dirtied and lost a controversial split decision? And you hold that against him?

Loma never came close to losing to an average Canelo or glass jawed Danny Jacobs.

Loma is 2 x GOLD medalist and best amateur of ALL TIME.

Dude can say w/e the **** he wants. MarGGGarito couldn't wear Loma's jockstrap.

[chrisJS]

He was asked a question. GGG's performance wasn't great but it wasn't bad. He won the fight but you can understand what he's saying here.

[Bjl12]

So, moving backwards is what then??.... Pressure? You are a fking idiot.

Or...counter-punching? ??

What happened to "boxing fans". This new batch are dumber than the Pac brigade honestly.

I guess if they worship MarGGGarito - there's only 3 punches in boxing - their simple understanding makes sense.

But damn yall make Trump, *****, and Duterte look like Einstein lmfao