Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How do you think fighters cheat USADA random year-round drug testing?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
    Wasn't banned and it wasn't a shot. IV was 100% legal in Nevada, for any reason, in any amount. To avoid abuse, Floyd & Manny voluntarily hired USADA to ensure that any IV use was for legitimate medical purposes. Everything was done by the book. There was no controversy or scandal until HBO's hired assassin wrote an extremely misleading article to create scandal where none existed.




    His private medical information is none of our business.




    Whether they are or they aren't, it doesn't matter since USADA is the one that decides if the use was legitimate, not the paramedic.

    Oh so Floyd mysteriously got ill, something that not been a medical issue before or the wouldn't have needed a retroactive TUE, and the only cure was an banned IV shot that can also mask PED use.


    What do you think could be wrong with Floyd, what kind of things does this banned IV shot treat?

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
      Oh so Floyd mysteriously got ill, something that not been a medical issue before or the wouldn't have needed a retroactive TUE, and the only cure was an banned IV shot that can also mask PED use.


      What do you think could be wrong with Floyd, what kind of things does this banned IV shot treat?

      According to WADA rules, Floyd could have had diarrhea. Or maybe an allergic reaction - he did list allergies on his prefight medical form. Guess we would need access to the TUE application to know the official diagnosis that would warrant rehydration via IV.


      Nevertheless, as it has been pointed out to you in previous post, the IV was monitored by USADA and Floyd provides samples before and after.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
        Oh so Floyd mysteriously got ill, something that not been a medical issue before or the wouldn't have needed a retroactive TUE,
        If he wasn't feeling well or was dehydrated, the most typical reasons for using an IV, it's not something you would have an on going TUE for.


        and the only cure was an banned IV shot that can also mask PED use.
        Who said it was the only cure? Maybe it was simply the best option.

        But your posts are hard to take seriously because you keep posting false information over and over. IV wasn't banned. Was 100% legal. Floyd & Manny simply hired an outside party to verify if use was legitimate. They verified that it was. Case closed.

        How could it mask PED use when USADA made Floyd give a sample immediately before the IV and immediately after? You're not making any sense.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Dosumpthin View Post
          According to WADA rules, Floyd could have had diarrhea. Or maybe an allergic reaction - he did list allergies on his prefight medical form. Guess we would need access to the TUE application to know the official diagnosis that would warrant rehydration via IV.


          Nevertheless, as it has been pointed out to you in previous post, the IV was monitored by USADA and Floyd provides samples before and after.

          Pretty sure boxers limit what they eat before a weigh in and have set meals at that time?

          And a anti-diuretic would help with diarrhea which was not in the shot.

          The allergic reaction does not check out as well as the shot does nothing for that also.

          The DCO was there, and saw what was happening, and then 19 days after the fight Floyd gets his retroactive TUE

          If Floyd was dehydrated, could have he given a urine sample before or given blood if he did have a medical emergency?

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
            If he wasn't feeling well or was dehydrated, the most typical reasons for using an IV, it's not something you would have an on going TUE for.




            Who said it was the only cure? Maybe it was simply the best option.

            But your posts are hard to take seriously because you keep posting false information over and over. IV wasn't banned. Was 100% legal. Floyd & Manny simply hired an outside party to verify if use was legitimate. They verified that it was. Case closed.

            How could it mask PED use when USADA made Floyd give a sample immediately before the IV and immediately after? You're not making any sense.
            they ignore this part

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
              If he wasn't feeling well or was dehydrated, the most typical reasons for using an IV, it's not something you would have an on going TUE for.




              Who said it was the only cure? Maybe it was simply the best option.

              But your posts are hard to take seriously because you keep posting false information over and over. IV wasn't banned. Was 100% legal. Floyd & Manny simply hired an outside party to verify if use was legitimate. They verified that it was. Case closed.

              How could it mask PED use when USADA made Floyd give a sample immediately before the IV and immediately after? You're not making any sense.
              It's banned by WADA, who were in charge of doping controls. And the only way you can used banned PEDs is to get a TUE. To say you need it for a medical condition.

              I've yet to hear anything on Floyd's medical condition, and because it was a retroactive TUE it means it suddenly came up when the drug testers came knocking.

              Comment


              • #57
                I don't think it's as hard as as people make it out to be.

                The athletes have inside sources as to when they will be getting tested.

                Have you ever heard of monkey whiz?

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
                  It's banned by WADA, who were in charge of doping controls. And the only way you can used banned PEDs is to get a TUE. To say you need it for a medical condition.
                  Which they say he did. So what's the problem?

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
                    Which they say he did. So what's the problem?
                    Except, no medical condition, and it would have to be a emergency one for them to allow retroactive one.

                    You can't even come up with what was wrong with Floyd, can anyone?

                    Let me know if you come up with any ideas.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
                      Except, no medical condition, and it would have to be a emergency one for them to allow retroactive one.
                      So then obviously it was.

                      Because otherwise, what you're suggesting, is that Floyd took salt water in front of USADA (instead of waiting to do it in private), and USADA, which in your scenario is completely corrupt and in Floyd's back pocket, instead of just letting him take salt water, they made him go through this entire TUE process, even though nobody would have ever known he had some salt water, just so they could publicly clear him of the thing nobody would had ever known about unless they told us! Which if they were in his back pocket, would never have been necessary.

                      Take a breath and think about how ****** your conspiracy theory is.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP