Lomachenko dominates Compubox Ratings...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • oscar9992
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2013
    • 2888
    • 160
    • 570
    • 16,692

    #1

    Lomachenko dominates Compubox Ratings...

    Various Compubox Ratings revealed...



    Compubox Plus/Minus (Landed - Oppon. Conn./Landed)

    Jabs thrown per round (Average)





    Jabs landed per round (Average)

    Opponents' total conn. PCT % (Lowest)

    Last edited by oscar9992; 01-04-2018, 01:03 AM.
  • oscar9992
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2013
    • 2888
    • 160
    • 570
    • 16,692

    #2
    Current TOP 5 Compubox Plus/Minus Leaders:

    1) Vasyl Lomachenko +19,4
    2) Terence Crawford + 14,6
    3) Naoya Inoue + 13,3
    4) Erislandy Lara + 13,1
    5) Mikey Garcia + 12,7


    The Previous Plus/Minus Leader: Floyd Mayweather Jr.




    Current Plus/Minus Leader: Vasyl Lomachenko

    Last edited by oscar9992; 01-04-2018, 12:56 AM.

    Comment

    • Boxing42
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2017
      • 1893
      • 78
      • 245
      • 13,707

      #3
      Loma has great technique but I sense that this is propaganda. i may be paranoid but I'm not naive!

      Comment

      • oscar9992
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2013
        • 2888
        • 160
        • 570
        • 16,692

        #4
        Bump!

        Comment

        • Mr Objecitivity
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2016
          • 2503
          • 75
          • 22
          • 12,065

          #5
          Not surprised to be honest. It is as expected. His offense and his defense currently is second to none. That's whilst taking into consideration his feats are accomplished against the 'best possible opponents' who are at the top whilst many of the other boxers are still below him in the compubox ranking, despite competing against inferior opposition. Like in Inoue's case.

          Comment

          • 'b'
            Delete account. TALMUD
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Nov 2017
            • 7105
            • 400
            • 481
            • 41,914

            #6
            Lomachenko da troof

            Comment

            • Robbie Barrett
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2013
              • 40891
              • 2,779
              • 667
              • 570,921

              #7
              Compubox wouldn't be bad if they were accurate. If they went through the fight afterwards and adjusted their widely inaccurate numbers. But they don't so they're useless.

              Comment

              • RedZmaja
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Dec 2015
                • 758
                • 39
                • 51
                • 7,424

                #8
                Lomachenko is on another level.

                Comment

                • Robbie Barrett
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Nov 2013
                  • 40891
                  • 2,779
                  • 667
                  • 570,921

                  #9
                  Originally posted by RedZmaja
                  Lomachenko is on another level.
                  In 2015 Danny Jacobs had a +/- of 24 was he on another level too? At the same time Klitschko had a +/- of -1, i guess he was shit?
                  Last edited by Robbie Barrett; 01-04-2018, 08:31 AM.

                  Comment

                  • Eff Pandas
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2012
                    • 52129
                    • 3,624
                    • 2,147
                    • 1,635,919

                    #10
                    Originally posted by oscar9992
                    Current TOP 5 Compubox Plus/Minus Leaders:

                    1) Vasyl Lomachenko +19,4
                    2) Terence Crawford + 14,6
                    3) Naoya Inoue + 13,3
                    4) Erislandy Lara + 13,1
                    5) Mikey Garcia + 12,7


                    The Previous Plus/Minus Leader: Floyd Mayweather Jr.



                    Current Plus/Minus Leader: Vasyl Lomachenko

                    I'm a compubox fan (which doesn't mean anything other than I like the idea of stats in boxing), but that +/- stat is a bs stat.

                    What difference does measuring my % landed vs my opponents % landed? I don't believe its a very accurate measurement of how good someone is in any way like its kinda advertised as with being the P4P of compubox stats.

                    I was previously a fan of it til I saw a recent post where Tyson Fury had a negative +/- number which sounded ******ed to me...til I looked at his punch stat numbers & saw guys were landing on him at a high %, but not at very high numbers.

                    That made me come to the conclusion that a better way to determine dominance in the ring would be to look at overall landed punches vs how many times you got hit divided by the number of rounds they fought.

                    So for example for Loma vs Rigo Loma landed 55 punches & got hit 15 times. Thats +40. Fight went 6 rounds. That gives him a 6.6 "score". It even kinda allows you to grade the dominance of a boxer vs other of his own performances. The Sosa fight for example would be a 17.6 showing how dominant that W was in comparison to the Rigo W.

                    But thats just me nerding out with numbers cuz I think there are massive issues with +/- cuz %'s are ****** in a volume game. /rant

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP