Lomachenko dominates Compubox Ratings...

[oscar9992]

Various Compubox Ratings revealed...



Compubox Plus/Minus (Landed - Oppon. Conn./Landed)

Jabs thrown per round (Average)





Jabs landed per round (Average)

Opponents' total conn. PCT % (Lowest)

[oscar9992]

Current TOP 5 Compubox Plus/Minus Leaders:

1) Vasyl Lomachenko +19,4
2) Terence Crawford + 14,6
3) Naoya Inoue + 13,3
4) Erislandy Lara + 13,1
5) Mikey Garcia + 12,7


The Previous Plus/Minus Leader: Floyd Mayweather Jr.




Current Plus/Minus Leader: Vasyl Lomachenko

[Boxing42]

Loma has great technique but I sense that this is propaganda. i may be paranoid but I'm not naive!

[oscar9992]

Bump!

[Mr Objecitivity]

Not surprised to be honest. It is as expected. His offense and his defense currently is second to none. That's whilst taking into consideration his feats are accomplished against the 'best possible opponents' who are at the top whilst many of the other boxers are still below him in the compubox ranking, despite competing against inferior opposition. Like in Inoue's case.

['b']

Lomachenko da troof

[Robbie Barrett]

Compubox wouldn't be bad if they were accurate. If they went through the fight afterwards and adjusted their widely inaccurate numbers. But they don't so they're useless.

[RedZmaja]

Lomachenko is on another level.

[Robbie Barrett]

Lomachenko is on another level.

In 2015 Danny Jacobs had a +/- of 24 was he on another level too? At the same time Klitschko had a +/- of -1, i guess he was shit?

[Eff Pandas]

Current TOP 5 Compubox Plus/Minus Leaders:

1) Vasyl Lomachenko +19,4
2) Terence Crawford + 14,6
3) Naoya Inoue + 13,3
4) Erislandy Lara + 13,1
5) Mikey Garcia + 12,7


The Previous Plus/Minus Leader: Floyd Mayweather Jr.



Current Plus/Minus Leader: Vasyl Lomachenko

I'm a compubox fan (which doesn't mean anything other than I like the idea of stats in boxing), but that +/- stat is a bs stat.

What difference does measuring my % landed vs my opponents % landed? I don't believe its a very accurate measurement of how good someone is in any way like its kinda advertised as with being the P4P of compubox stats.

I was previously a fan of it til I saw a recent post where Tyson Fury had a negative +/- number which sounded ******ed to me...til I looked at his punch stat numbers & saw guys were landing on him at a high %, but not at very high numbers.

That made me come to the conclusion that a better way to determine dominance in the ring would be to look at overall landed punches vs how many times you got hit divided by the number of rounds they fought.

So for example for Loma vs Rigo Loma landed 55 punches & got hit 15 times. Thats +40. Fight went 6 rounds. That gives him a 6.6 "score". It even kinda allows you to grade the dominance of a boxer vs other of his own performances. The Sosa fight for example would be a 17.6 showing how dominant that W was in comparison to the Rigo W.

But thats just me nerding out with numbers cuz I think there are massive issues with +/- cuz %'s are ****** in a volume game. /rant