Originally posted by Curt Henning
View Post
You and the thread starter appear to have some kind of vendetta against Gennady Golovkin. I'm a Golovkin fan and even I don't think or comment about him as much as you do. Proving that you have an unhealthy obsession related to Golovkin, along with the thread starter, as you seem to be repeating the same points over and over again, that becomes irrelevant after a period of time.
Why do you extend my 'objectivity', only to boxers like Ward, Cotto, Floyd or Canelo? Why not also to boxers like Inoue, Nonito Donaire, Roman Gonzalez, Amir Khan and etc. Why do you demand that I defend the first set of boxers and not the second set? Or are you telling me to be objective whilst you're being non-objective and hypocritical? If that's the case, then you are a self-contradiction and that you have no rights to demand me to be objective before you solve your own hypocrisy and lack of objectivity.
I haven't got a problem with Ward not moving up to heavyweight. The same way I haven't got a problem with Golovkin not moving up to super middleweight or light heavyweight. Just that if you demand Golovkin to do one thing, then I can also demand Ward to do a particular thing too. There aren't any obligation for either guy to move up in weight in the official rules. The official rules don't state: boxer x or y must move up. If they want to compete in one weight division, then that's their personal choice.
Comment