That doesn't make sense because that isn't what I said. What I was saying was that Whyte's promoter is trying to talk Whyte into a title shot rather than have his fighter beat quality guys to earn it. The best guy Whyte has ever beaten was Robert Helenius and that fight was boring as hell.
Taking Ortiz for (presumably) less money and then saying he is a tougher opponent simply doesn't add up.
Luis Ortiz is without a doubt the much tougher opponent.
Because its a meaningless fight. The guys sole qualification is having lasted 7 rounds with Anthony Joshua.
Taking Ortiz for (presumably) less money and then saying he is a tougher opponent simply doesn't add up.
Whyte, if easier, and paying more money....why not? Please explain.
Comment