Can someone explain to aboutfkntime

[aboutfkntime]

I thought boxing was about divisions, not wiggle room. Besides, theres plenty of wiggle room between 147 and 154

you thought Golovkin would fight " anyone from 154-168 "

[aboutfkntime]

hey, I have lost my elephant.....


did anyone see where it went ?


I mean..... I know that Gloveking, TonyGE, and Shape Up, have not seen it.....

but what about you adults, did any grown-ups see where it went?

[GGG Gloveking]

you thought Golovkin would fight " anyone from 154-168 "

I thought you'd at least be smart enough to understand 5>4.

Guess I was wrong

[aboutfkntime]

I thought you'd at least be smart enough to understand 5>4.

Guess I was wrong

I thought you'd at least be smart enough to understand 55<60.

Guess I was wrong

hey......

you haven't seen my elephant, have you ?

pretty sure that he was wandering around here earlier

[GGG Gloveking]

I thought you'd at least be smart enough to understand 55<60.

Guess I was wrong

hey......

you haven't seen my elephant, have you ?

pretty sure that he was wandering around here earlier

54<55<60.

What part of this do you fail to comprehend?

[aboutfkntime]

54>55>60.

What part of this do you fail to comprehend?

I comprehend ALL of it, and then I evaluate ALL of it in context

you only comprehend the first part, the part that suits you

the part that involves you trying to get your client off on a technicality

speaking of context.....

I take it you have not seen my lost elephant ?

[TonyGe]

I comprehend ALL of it, and then I evaluate ALL of it in context

you only comprehend the first part, the part that suits you

the part that involves you trying to get your client off on a technicality

speaking of context.....

I take it you have not seen my lost elephant ?

No we didn't find a lost elephant but we did find some loose screws that came out of your head.

[aboutfkntime]

No we didn't find a lost elephant but we did find some loose screws that came out of your head.

right

you did not find, the elephant in the room

right

the thing is, genius.....

you questioned whether Golovkin promised that he would fight Canelo at 154, and then you made a childish excuse.....

then you questioned whether Golovkin promised that he would negotiate on weight should Canelo vacate the WBC title, and then you made another childish excuse.....

and then you asked for links

but now, after reading those links.....

you don't really have anything much to say at all..... other than, being unable to see the elephant in the room

right ^^

this thread is..... not really working out how you guys hoped it would, huh?

let me guess, will your reply be about the same as gloveking's.....

where you suddenly/miraculously forget about all of the facts, and forget about all of those links..... and make a profound statement something along the lines of..... 4<5?

[GGG Gloveking]

I comprehend ALL of it, and then I evaluate ALL of it in context

you only comprehend the first part, the part that suits you

the part that involves you trying to get your client off on a technicality

speaking of context.....

I take it you have not seen my lost elephant ?

What is the context of simple arithmetic?

[TonyGe]

right

you did not find, the elephant in the room

right

the thing is, genius.....

you questioned whether Golovkin promised that he would fight Canelo at 154, and then you made a childish excuse.....

then you questioned whether Golovkin promised that he would negotiate on weight should Canelo vacate the WBC title, and then you made another childish excuse.....

and then you asked for links

but now, after reading those links.....

you don't really have anything much to say at all..... other than, being unable to see the elephant in the room

right ^^

this thread is..... not really working out how you guys hoped it would, huh?

I responded to your links. Don't you remember. Oh yeah loose screws...