Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Saunders: Golovkin Must KO Canelo or He Will Get Robbed

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by kushking View Post
    Just wondering what your bītch ass is doing reading comments on Christmas morning since your such a cool guy? Thats right u are here trolling 4 dīck because your super ***** was defective & your hubbies not happy.
    Lol. Don't mind these Nelo haters. Look at the premise in the title....same fools said before the first fight, that lil'g had to KO Nelo to get a win. Since it was Lil'Gs worst performance to date...yet again, they're claiming it again as a reminder...

    BJS knows Canelo is battle tested. He hopes lil'G will apply some damage, wear and tear, on Nelo, cause Nelo ain't no Monroe Jr. when the Mexican and Traveller meet. Mexicans are more hardcore travellers as far as we know.

    Comment


    • #22
      Mexico Independence day or Cinco de Mayo in front of a rabidly pro-Canelo crowd... the judges know the commissions always have their backs.

      Comment


      • #23
        GGG will KO Saunders but not Canelo.
        From the first fight, if GGG dares to walk through Canelo punches to knock him out, he will meet a heavy punch that will knock him out instead.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by D3v1Ld0g View Post
          "Golovkin Must KO Canelo or He Will Get Robbed"

          More like, 'if golovkin wants to win he has to land more than one meaningful punch.'

          Lol @ knocking out canelo.
          Lol right,*golovkin lands a handful of clean punches in twelve rounds*
          ROBBED

          Comment


          • #25
            canelo ran doe! canyellow ran da whole fight! not fair....u supposed to stand in the middle of ring and let ggg punch you till hes tired or you go down! that box!

            Comment


            • #26
              Can't KO what he can't hit. Golovkin couldn't land big punches on Canelo, the only thing that landed was his weak jab, he couldn't even put anything behind that.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by DramaShow View Post
                Yeah basically which is why a rematch is pointless. He'll get robbed worse the 2nd time round, the draw was to set up a rematch.
                Then don't watch fool!

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Randall Cunning View Post
                  Same applies to Saunders. Its in Saunders best interest for Golovkin to win if he wants to be undisputed, he'll get robbed all the same against Canelo. Its the worst thing about boxing when everyone can openly say that someone will never get a win if it goes to points. I guarantee PPV buys will be down on Golovkin/Canelo 2, who the **** wants to pay for a fight you already know the outcome of? Although tbh PPV buys will be falsified as much as the outcome. **** Oscar
                  Quit crying b-itch! If you don't like the fight then don't watch.
                  Or is it you can't afford the ppv... 😅

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by kushking View Post
                    Just like u woke up with a dīck in your mouth & said wtf "hoos dīks sin my mouf" then u went online to profess your gayness for ggg & the resulting hatred u have 4 canelo & those who acknowledge his standing as a proven fighter. Stop trolling my comments in search of cōck,I don't swing that way homegirl,u gotta disinflate them ggg blowup dolls u have all over your closet before even thinking of trolling 4 dīck like a wolf bītch in heat.:bukkake::*******:
                    Lol, damn homie! You got me and my lady rolling overhere! Lol
                    But you know that lame rrayvez is always hating on Canelo and any Mexican fighter for that matter. That's just who he is. He probably got punked all through junior high school and high school by Mexicans and that's why he don't like Mexicans. He's a straight lame!

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Randall Cunning View Post
                      Same applies to Saunders. Its in Saunders best interest for Golovkin to win if he wants to be undisputed, he'll get robbed all the same against Canelo. Its the worst thing about boxing when everyone can openly say that someone will never get a win if it goes to points. I guarantee PPV buys will be down on Golovkin/Canelo 2, who the **** wants to pay for a fight you already know the outcome of? Although tbh PPV buys will be falsified as much as the outcome. **** Oscar
                      He wouldn't get robbed against Canelo because Canelo wouldn't even fight him. The president of GBP ruled out BJS as an opponent for Canelo because he's a "runner" like Lara .. allegedly.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP