Ward would have beat the piss out of Joe Calzaghe

[Navalny20!8]

Calzaghe is an over rated euro bum....

Calzaghe was decent. However, I never liked his style and felt that he was extremely overrated by the brits, who always seem to overhype anyone wearing the Union Jack.

As far as Ward vs. Calzaghe goes, I'd pick Ward to win a close and a very boring decision.

[MELLY-MEL...]

Nope, not a chance

[Sadiqkingofko]

is there any doubt????
#1 fighter at 168 history is Ward and #2 is Joe

[chrisJS]

Calzaghe was much better. He also fought fairly too.

[A-Wolf]

Calzaghe was elite. Except as a tactician. Ward wins easily.

[iamboxing]

Calazaghe would have overworked Ward and figured him out pretty quickly and hit low to counter his dirty tactics, unlike Kovalev who stayed honourable even when he had his balls battered.

[Curt Henning]

Would have, could have, should have, but never did. My money would be on Joe. He was too fast, too smart and threw way too many punches every round for Ward to deal with. I think he would beat Ward on Ward's best day even in Oakland. He beat Jones and Hopkins so Ward would be easy work.

ya man joe def beat prime roy and nard...lol

[Curt Henning]

Calazaghe would have overworked Ward and figured him out pretty quickly and hit low to counter his dirty tactics, unlike Kovalev who stayed honourable even when he had his balls battered.

yeah..i hear you....pretty tough for your opponent when ur balls are up at your beltline tho.....

[Tony Trick-Pony]

From what I've seen, typically a high volume good boxer beats a low volume good boxer most of the time.

Joe's work rate strangles Ward over 12 for a close but comfortable decision win.

The slappa hands another unbeaten an "L"

['b']

From what I've seen, typically a high volume good boxer beats a low volume good boxer most of the time.

Joe's work rate strangles Ward over 12 for a close but comfortable decision win.

The slappa hands another unbeaten an "L"

What if the fight takes place in the USA with a USA ref and judges though?