Comments Thread For: Saunders: Golovkin is 35 Now, Can't Keep Up To Outbox Me

[Lester Tutor]

Keep telling yourself that man, if you say it enough you might actually convince yourself that's what happend

He ran and did what he had to do to survive.

A draw wasn' t justified. Canelo won some rounds but It wasn't really a close fight

Even if you ignore the disgraceful 118-110 scorecard. The ref that had it a draw gave the 7th to Canelo and there is no way that was a Canelo round

Just take solace that Canelo got another gift decision that he didn't deserve.

The fact Gennady went home with all his straps should let you know that he won the fight.

Wait for the rematch and watch Nelo vs GGG 1 again as well as Kova vs Ward 1...

[rrayvez]

Funny how you deny that,yet you don't even mention anyone else with a better resume as an example,thats a true strawmans move quitting because you have no rebuttal.

He does have BY FAR the p4p #1 resume especially for being 27 yrs old, he's the face of the sport no matter how much you stay in denial from hate & he has way more of the best fighters on his resume than ANY other current fighter & even if clowns wanna claim he lost all his semi close fights vs the best,hes gone toe to toe with them all without so much as ever being hurt,& he now has yet another supposed boogieman fighter on his resume in ggg.

there's a difference between quitting because you have no rebuttal and just choosing not to continue a debate with an illogical fan boy. You love Canelo and in your eyes he's the greatest thing in your life. I on the other hand see him for what he is. A good fighter who is often saved in big fights by judges because he happens to be a marketable Mexican with red hair. If it wasn't for his marketability, he'd have anywhere between 3 to 5 losses by now on his record. But thanks to fans like you who have their love blinders on, you'll overlook that and convince yourself that he's #1 despite the facts.

[Graz]

Golovkin will hurt Saunders very badly.

[kushking]

there's a difference between quitting because you have no rebuttal and just choosing not to continue a debate with an illogical fan boy. You love Canelo and in your eyes he's the greatest thing in your life. I on the other hand see him for what he is. A good fighter who is often saved in big fights by judges because he happens to be a marketable Mexican with red hair. If it wasn't for his marketability, he'd have anywhere between 3 to 5 losses by now on his record. But thanks to fans like you who have their love blinders on, you'll overlook that and convince yourself that he's #1 despite the facts.

It sure angered u that I said IN MY OPINION canelo is p4p#1 resume in boxing,so much so that you got triggered & threw a bîtchfit. why dont you actually list the fighters that have a better resume than canelo instead of throw a bîtchfit like a fanboi. You can argue all this bs nonsense but only a literal ****** would claim he lost to ggg & lara & or trout. If you believe that bs then your truly a dsab ggg nuthugger. When I say RESUME I mean hes fought more of the best fighters available than anyone in boxing atm. Take gggs dî*k out your throat for 1 second & think about how ****** you sound claiming lara won & ggg did too,yet he did way better vs Lara than ggg did vs him,& Lara "ran" way worse without fighting than u dsab claim canelo did vs ggg,compubox backs that up that.

Unlike you I can care less what race,or whether I like certain fighters,I am honest when I rate ALL fighters resumes.

I don't make fanboi statements like you do,thats why you can't even negate THE FACT that I said that canelo has the best resume in boxing,your too much of a b**ch to follow through with your fanboi anger of me saying facts.
Your the ggg dsab fanboi that tries to argue with common sense,its common sense that im basing my opinions of fighters on numbers just as Boxrec computer does,thats why your a dsab gggroupie that can't take it when someone uses facts to demonstrate that im not a canelo fanboi,im just an honest fan of whatever boxer has proven themselves from early on & am honest about what each fighter has accomplished. And its day & night compared to ggg.

.

Thats why I have principles & you don't,I don't base which fighters I give more credit to on dsab fanboi reasons like you CLEARLY do,your so pathetic you try to deflect by saying im the one in love with canelo when your bîtch ass dîckrides ggg 24/7 & HATES canelo constantly trolling him daily.

[rrayvez]

It sure angered u that I said IN MY OPINION canelo is p4p#1 resume in boxing,so much so that you got triggered & threw a bîtchfit. why dont you actually list the fighters that have a better resume than canelo instead of throw a bîtchfit like a fanboi. You can argue all this bs nonsense but only a literal ****** would claim he lost to ggg & lara & or trout. If you believe that bs then your truly a dsab ggg nuthugger. When I say RESUME I mean hes fought more of the best fighters available than anyone in boxing atm. Take gggs dî*k out your throat for 1 second & think about how ****** you sound claiming lara won & ggg did too,yet he did way better vs Lara than ggg did vs him,& Lara "ran" way worse without fighting than u dsab claim canelo did vs ggg,compubox backs that up that.

Unlike you I can care less what race,or whether I like certain fighters,I am honest when I rate ALL fighters resumes.

I don't make fanboi statements like you do,thats why you can't even negate THE FACT that I said that canelo has the best resume in boxing,your too much of a b**ch to follow through with your fanboi anger of me saying facts.
Your the ggg dsab fanboi that tries to argue with common sense,its common sense that im basing my opinions of fighters on numbers just as Boxrec computer does,thats why your a dsab gggroupie that can't take it when someone uses facts to demonstrate that im not a canelo fanboi,im just an honest fan of whatever boxer has proven themselves from early on & am honest about what each fighter has accomplished. And its day & night compared to ggg.

.

Thats why I have principles & you don't,I don't base which fighters I give more credit to on dsab fanboi reasons like you CLEARLY do,your so pathetic you try to deflect by saying im the one in love with canelo when your bîtch ass dîckrides ggg 24/7 & HATES canelo constantly trolling him daily.

I'm throwing the bi*chfit?? "you're the one typing up novels that nobody is even bothering to read entirely and following my posts across different message boards. How do you have time to be on my nuts so much when you have Canelos down your throat? If you had any sense you'd know that p4p isn't entirely about resume and more so about performance, skills, etc and Canelo only looks good vs guys that are smaller than him or zombies like Chavez and angulo. If that wets your panties then so be it, but no reputable list has Canelo at #1 p4p. Only fan boys with man crushes like you. And for the record, I'm not even a ggg fan. Sometimes I root for him, sometimes I root against. It's only you Canelo groupies that think anyone who doesn't bow at Canelos feet must be a ggg fan.

[Madison Boxing]

saunders has nothing to stop golovkin coming forward and hes just not that great a fighter. hes not that far removed from scraping past a complete bum, akalov or something. golovkins as good as hes ever been, i thought he put on a great performance in his last fight and if the judges did there job he'd likely be fighter of the year in 2017. he could fight saunders at 38 and he'd still beat him, theres a difference between world and elite level.

[kushking]

I'm throwing the bi*chfit?? "you're the one typing up novels that nobody is even bothering to read entirely and following my posts across different message boards. How do you have time to be on my nuts so much when you have Canelos down your throat? If you had any sense you'd know that p4p isn't entirely about resume and more so about performance, skills, etc and Canelo only looks good vs guys that are smaller than him or zombies like Chavez and angulo. If that wets your panties then so be it, but no reputable list has Canelo at #1 p4p. Only fan boys with man crushes like you. And for the record, I'm not even a ggg fan. Sometimes I root for him, sometimes I root against. It's only you Canelo groupies that think anyone who doesn't bow at Canelos feet must be a ggg fan.

You dsab your the ****** fággot that hates certain fighters to the point of blind ******ation. Nobody was following anything your bîtch ass said,I hapoened to come across u doing what u do best being a dsab trying to blatantly LIE about gbp supposedly putting tiny ringsize in their fighters contract (who u hate)& use it to supposedly prove what a bîtch canelo is. Funny thing too,as floyd is the one who used to put huge ringsize in contract,the same floyd u :*******: 24/7. You respond with"a novel" while claiming I wrote "a novel u wont read"

[kushking]

You clearly don't know **** about boxing becaues if you did you would know that 400 amateur fights headgear or not takes a huge toll on you. And canelo only had 14 fights more against unknown mexican bums at an early age. You make it sound like canelo had so many more pro fights. And GGG was facing the best in the world in the amateurs while canelo's first 30 fights were against cab drivers. GGG's toll > canelo's not even close. Regardless he didn't take punishment as a pro, mid 30's you lose your legs, reflexes, and speed. If you disagree with that you're a moron.

You ****** dsab canelo had 44 fights as an amatuer & lost 2 before age 15,& his resume since age 15 was VS GROWN PROFESSIONAL MEN IN 1 of the biggest fighting capitals Mexico.

You are truly the dumbest dsab on this entire site trying to claim ggg fighting amatuer bums for 3 rds is more than canelo having fought in pros since age 15,& he did not face bums u dîckless fàg,he has been taking on difficult fights since age 19.

ggg went pro at age 24,he didn't even win gold despite having many yrs longer than the kids he faced,ALL good boxers go pro unless they aren't good enough,only a true dîcksucking gggimp would say such ******ity as claiming a 15 yr old fighting grown pros in Mexico is easier than fighting worse than bums by definition that amateurs are in Kazakhstan of all places.

Only a true dumb **** would say "ggg fought more than 400 amatuer fights vs the worlds best" Ill let anyone who reads this dumb sh u write to piss themselves laughing YOU DON'T KNOW SH ABOUT BOXING

[_Maxi]

He is what he is, YOU need to learn reading comprehension.

Theres a difference between someone being a proven elite fighter that faced the best & still stayed young til age late 30s because he took care of himself & someone aging slower from going pro at an old age,

from never fighting anyone elite til age 34 & therefore by default having very short fights from all the bums he kod early.

I have always said ggg is a skilled fighter for his style with several flaws,whom has never proven it vs the best because hes afraid of losing his windfall from canelo sweepstakes,& he was someone who chased money & easy belts his whole career rather than sacrificing to be great. And ggg stays being used as a puppet by Sanchez & loeffler .

Ignorant, doesn't matter the fights he had or didn't have, he can't avoid his AGE. It's AGE what makes you worse.

[hotdogdragon]

i mean, if you look at it as total rounds boxed, GGG has way more in ring experience....

Canelo was fighting grown ass men at 15, sure... that were his same size... and bums. I'm sure those 350 amateur fights, world championship, and a trip to the olympics were just a walk in the park? like, everyone can do that, right?

Canelo is your hero that's fine, and your opinion that he's p4p #1 is fine too, but *most* analysts disagree with you. And i guess they are all ****** *****es too. Makes sense.

*cue freakout*