Comments Thread For: Saunders: Golovkin is 35 Now, Can't Keep Up To Outbox Me

[turnedup]

I don't even think GGG is on the decline as people like to point out, he's fighting people now who are also good fighters is all.

In the hundreds of years, better yet thousands of years of competitive sports what athlete gets better beyond their early 30s? I keep telling folks on here, as someone on the tail end of their 30s even as a non-athlete you feel the slide. Unless you are using something you are sliding no matter what..in some cases genetics favors people so it's not as visible but ain't no way in hell an athlete isn't declining after like 31/32..they might able to muster a masterful performance but definitely not the same way or with the same consistency as they could in their 20's.

[aboutfkntime]

Golovkin would get Lemieux'd

[j0zef]

Well, the reason he's now 35 is because you 'needed 18 months' for him to get old.

[kingstip9]

I just can't respect this guy. The way he openly ducked the GGG fight, when GGG was on a tear up. He wanted no part of him, he did not want to even test the waters by saying he might fight him

And now! when GGG has aged, shown signs of slippage, and had some close encounters of losing he has suddenly become the brave fighter. I definitely can't respect that.
Dude is almost suprised he had such an easy time with Lemieux and it's really encouraged him, but I still see him as the inconsistent fighter wth a poor gas tank, which will put him at a loss against GGG (even at this point)

[Vlad_]

Wow BJS sniffing a bit too much of his own farts. Got him a little high off that Lemieux 12 UD, not even a KO...

[kushking]

In the hundreds of years, better yet thousands of years of competitive sports what athlete gets better beyond their early 30s? I keep telling folks on here, as someone on the tail end of their 30s even as a non-athlete you feel the slide. Unless you are using something you are sliding no matter what..in some cases genetics favors people so it's not as visible but ain't no way in hell an athlete isn't declining after like 31/32..they might able to muster a masterful performance but definitely not the same way or with the same consistency as they could in their 20's.

It has more to do with how much damage they've endured,ggg hasn't aged in the ring with his fights mostly all only being a few rds & vs weak opposition.

Mayweather was able to fight pro til 38,he didn't get punished very much due to his style. GGG only went pro at age 24 too. Look at him vs canelo he went full 12 without gassing horribly like kovalev,hes not old he has just finally daring to be great & I have much more respect for him than I did before because of it. He still needs to face Jacobs again or move up to 168.

In one sense you are right though that surely a fighter whos 35 is past his prime,but theres plenty of reasons why ggg hasn't aged like many other fighters & certainly not enough to be considered old or an unimpressive win for anyone. Hes undefeated still so he should still count as a p4p win for anyone off that alone.

[PsychoPat]

Triple jab hammer will defile this ***** miscreant.

[James09]

Lets make this fight.

[Diegosome1]

GGG will cut off the ring, eat his shots and pummel sanders

[icha]

saunders is starting to get annoying, he already was big time, lol... ****ing lemule now we have to listen to a bunch BS because limited lemule couldnt do ****...