Jacobs-Saunders is more interesting than Canelo-GGG II

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Randall Cunning
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Oct 2015
    • 6041
    • 163
    • 30
    • 84,599

    #31
    Originally posted by Derranged
    Yea meanwhile his next opponent will be some Siberian uranium mining worker.
    Or worse, Amir Khan. Werent they talking about doing a catchweight fight a few months ago?

    Comment

    • Randall Cunning
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Oct 2015
      • 6041
      • 163
      • 30
      • 84,599

      #32
      Originally posted by BodiesInFlight
      He's also affiliated with Hearn
      Its payback for not doing Tete/Burnett. Theyre like a pair of children.

      Warren - "Butler aint fighting McDonnell, and you can forget about Yarde/Burton we want Buglioni"
      Hearn - "Yarde aint fighting Buglioni, and you can forget about Tete/Burnett"
      Warren - "OK, no Jacobs/Saunders"

      Round and round it goes.

      **** forgot about the whole Crolla/Flanagan debacle aswell.

      Comment

      • Santa_
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Mar 2015
        • 14673
        • 1,417
        • 378
        • 143,233

        #33
        I agree. Their styles would make for an exciting fight.

        Sweet Pea Saunders needs someone else to bring the heat and GGG would do just that.

        Canelo/Sweet Pea would be a lot more tactical and slow paced.

        Comment

        • chrisJS
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2007
          • 8989
          • 331
          • 64
          • 78,477

          #34
          Originally posted by Curt Henning
          god you people are insufferable

          why even watch or go on boxing forums if its all politics....and lowblows on the hublot.....why bother?

          it was clear who the better man was? lol....i dont know what you watched but it wasnt clear to me and plenty of people....if byrds card was 115-113 canelo nobody would have complained about the judging at all.....good lord you are such a pansy crybaby
          Says the guy getting his panties in a twist over one persons opinion.

          Your biased so your view is invalid and why I don't ready you. Get over it.

          Comment

          • TonyGe
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2016
            • 11867
            • 379
            • 149
            • 173,865

            #35
            Originally posted by Curt Henning
            god you people are insufferable

            why even watch or go on boxing forums if its all politics....and lowblows on the hublot.....why bother?

            it was clear who the better man was? lol....i dont know what you watched but it wasnt clear to me and plenty of people....if byrds card was 115-113 canelo nobody would have complained about the judging at all.....good lord you are such a pansy crybaby
            Curt all that would have done is draw attention to the other bad scorecard that had it a draw. Byrd's score was so outrageous that
            Don Trella's score got lost in the controversy. It went exactly as planned.

            Comment

            • Curt Henning
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Mar 2017
              • 11440
              • 551
              • 24
              • 176,018

              #36
              Originally posted by chrisJS
              Says the guy getting his panties in a twist over one persons opinion.

              Your biased so your view is invalid and why I don't ready you. Get over it.
              right...im biased...and you're not biased...right...sure LOL

              must be nice living in that fantasy world....the one where it was obvious that ggg clearly won

              Comment

              • Curt Henning
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Mar 2017
                • 11440
                • 551
                • 24
                • 176,018

                #37
                Originally posted by TonyGe
                Curt all that would have done is draw attention to the other bad scorecard that had it a draw. Byrd's score was so outrageous that
                Don Trella's score got lost in the controversy. It went exactly as planned.
                again..more fantasy tony....it must be nice to live in your world...

                i dont care if you scored the fight for golovkin...i dont care if you thought he won....but this idea that it was some clear win and that golovkin got jobbed is just ridiculous ....i have no idea what you watched....but you must count jabs as flush power punches or something

                Comment

                • Boxing Goat
                  The G.O.A.T.
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Aug 2013
                  • 13150
                  • 557
                  • 1,027
                  • 128,865

                  #38
                  The lineal title fight is always more interesting

                  Comment

                  • TonyGe
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Dec 2016
                    • 11867
                    • 379
                    • 149
                    • 173,865

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Curt Henning
                    right...im biased...and you're not biased...right...sure LOL

                    must be nice living in that fantasy world....the one where it was obvious that ggg clearly won
                    I'm not saying your biased. I just don't agree with your scoring of the fight, or the judges scoring for that matter.

                    Comment

                    • chrisJS
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 8989
                      • 331
                      • 64
                      • 78,477

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Curt Henning
                      you're not biased.
                      Correct.

                      Now move on.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP