Ok, what is P4P based on? Like seriously.

[Joe Beamish]

It's a cool rating system where fighters don't have to face each other. You can just make a list and put Thurman above (or below) Spence or Crawford. They don't have to fight. Wilder and Joshua don't have to fight. Jacobs and Canelo. This is easier than having like, real championships.

[Jubei]

Everybody uses different criteria, some people (specially here on NSB) rate race and ethnicity above everything else.

[TheBigLug]

I go by good wins, simple as that and then the manner of the wins.

You can have all the talent in the world but if you're not using it and proving it against the other top fighters and racking up good wins then it counts for nothing.

[jmrf4435]

quality and quantity of wins

It's that simple

[Richard Hamilton]

I base it on who I think are the best fighters. **** resume and other opinions.

[N/A]

What P4P *should* be based on is:

There are 17 divisions. Who is dominating their division the most? Who is accomplishing the most, *at their weight*.

By that definition, the P4P list should heavily favor unified champions. Anthony Joshua, GGG, Crawford, etc.

[.!WAR MIKEY!.]

on made up subjectivity that a fanboy bends to favor their fighter.

[lizard_man]

P4P is based on many things. Does the fighter have white or dark skin? Is he promoted by Bob arum, golden boy, or haymon? Is he a potential ppv star? How many ppv sales does he have? Does he sell out arenas? Who is he signed to? Showtime? Espn? Hbo? Is he boring in the ring or does he have mexican style. Those all come into play when we're trying to figure out p4p fighters.

[Rock&Roll]

KEY FACTORS:

-The phase of the moon
-The position of venus relative to the sun
-Precession of the equinoxes
-Observing gravity (molecular make up)
-The composition of dark matter
-The position of Uranus relative to the earth

Once the above is known, we can clearly identify the p4p #1.

[EdWins]

SMH. That's racist

I'm Mexican I can't be racist.