Tweet
I'm saying you are trashing the fight despite picking Rigo and knowing of the size differential. Yet, you are saying Mayweather beat the best version of Marquez which is as preposterous as your Loma-Rigo pick.
My point was Loma fought a guy who 1 year ago was only 1 weight class apart. Marquez had BARELY got to 135. Two fights (one against the natural 130 pound Casamayor) after a very short stop at 130 (3 fights).
It's a fact that in March of 2007 Marquez had never fought above 126 and Floyd was preparing for a fight with shot Oscar at 154. That's 28 lbs. Then Floyd went to 147 and Marquez 130. Marquez barely got to 135 and was undersized at the weight and he looked pudgier than any other fight in his career due to the rapid weight rise on top of rapidly jumping up two divisions. Rigo and Loma have never been more than 8 lbs apart whereas Marquez shot up 12 lbs on the back of just jumping up 5 lbs so 17 lbs is more than 8 lbs no matter how it's sliced.
Neither is a great win IMO. I knew Loma would wreck Rigo he's bigger and much better. I wanted the fight to shut up the many fans and cult of Rigo who always claimed size didn't matter and Loma was no match. Nobody wanted Marquez-Mayweather it wasn't a fight anybody was like "Oh yeah I wanna see that". Nobody even thought about it until GBP vice-president whispered into JMM's ear knowing their client was angry at being paid $1m or less a fight and couldn't deliver Pacquaio III.
The fact you picked Rigo easily and then ****ted on it and are claiming Mayweather beat the best Marquez is a clear sign of bias IMO.
I brought up his personal life as a reference he's not the most honest dude and he will say anything to make himself look innocent and good and he will say anything to **** on someone else always. He's a very defensive and insecure individual.
My point was Loma fought a guy who 1 year ago was only 1 weight class apart. Marquez had BARELY got to 135. Two fights (one against the natural 130 pound Casamayor) after a very short stop at 130 (3 fights).
It's a fact that in March of 2007 Marquez had never fought above 126 and Floyd was preparing for a fight with shot Oscar at 154. That's 28 lbs. Then Floyd went to 147 and Marquez 130. Marquez barely got to 135 and was undersized at the weight and he looked pudgier than any other fight in his career due to the rapid weight rise on top of rapidly jumping up two divisions. Rigo and Loma have never been more than 8 lbs apart whereas Marquez shot up 12 lbs on the back of just jumping up 5 lbs so 17 lbs is more than 8 lbs no matter how it's sliced.
Neither is a great win IMO. I knew Loma would wreck Rigo he's bigger and much better. I wanted the fight to shut up the many fans and cult of Rigo who always claimed size didn't matter and Loma was no match. Nobody wanted Marquez-Mayweather it wasn't a fight anybody was like "Oh yeah I wanna see that". Nobody even thought about it until GBP vice-president whispered into JMM's ear knowing their client was angry at being paid $1m or less a fight and couldn't deliver Pacquaio III.
The fact you picked Rigo easily and then ****ted on it and are claiming Mayweather beat the best Marquez is a clear sign of bias IMO.
I brought up his personal life as a reference he's not the most honest dude and he will say anything to make himself look innocent and good and he will say anything to **** on someone else always. He's a very defensive and insecure individual.
Now Floyd has changed his position and said if the skills are equal size matters... I'm going by his first statement and not the revised one numb nuts 
Comment