Do you honestly think beating an all time great heavyweight 19 fights in is getting "exposed" fair enough he got knocked down but he came back and won.
As for Parker "deserving" 35% he won't be generating 35% of the income so I don't see how you can argue that's what he deserves.
You say he looked poor against takam but still won pretty much every round. It wasn't his best performance but he looked more comfortable than Parker did.
As for Parker "deserving" 35% he won't be generating 35% of the income so I don't see how you can argue that's what he deserves.
You say he looked poor against takam but still won pretty much every round. It wasn't his best performance but he looked more comfortable than Parker did.
Comment