Tweet
Seriously, put your opinion on Tyson Fury is guilty or innocent aside. Why did UKAD only bring a failed test to light over a year later, thus allowing fighters with failed tests to continue fighting?
It begs the question how many other fighters in the UK have failed tests and nothing has been done about it? Do they only implement a ban when it suits them? when they're influenced to do so?
UKAD as an organisation only has a £8m a year budget, which is actually very very little when you understand how business works. Maybe it costs a lot more money to deal with a failed test than a clean one, so they're not dealing with every case correctly. It seems to me Fury's test would have never come to light but then something triggered it a year later.
Fury may well be guilty but the whole timeline and process of what happened makes me think they have some sort of corruption going on there. A lot of things don't add up from the UKAD side.
Makes you wonder how easily influenced they are by outside sources and how many other failed tests they're sitting on.
It begs the question how many other fighters in the UK have failed tests and nothing has been done about it? Do they only implement a ban when it suits them? when they're influenced to do so?
UKAD as an organisation only has a £8m a year budget, which is actually very very little when you understand how business works. Maybe it costs a lot more money to deal with a failed test than a clean one, so they're not dealing with every case correctly. It seems to me Fury's test would have never come to light but then something triggered it a year later.
Fury may well be guilty but the whole timeline and process of what happened makes me think they have some sort of corruption going on there. A lot of things don't add up from the UKAD side.
Makes you wonder how easily influenced they are by outside sources and how many other failed tests they're sitting on.
Comment