Comments Thread For: Team Hammer Smile at UKAD Ruling To Reverse Tyson Fury Loss

[Lester Tutor]

Erol Ceylan is a Turkish pimp. Even Hammer looks Turkish as my Ottoman empire flourished with Romanian blood. Makes sense why Erol pimpin it

[Simurgh]

So what happens to Wlad's fight - was he clear?

['b']

Erol Ceylan is a Turkish pimp. Even Hammer looks Turkish as my Ottoman empire flourished with Romanian blood. Makes sense why Erol pimpin it

Would certainly explain why he's such a **** boxer

[Vinnykin]

So what happens to Wlad's fight - was he clear?

He passed all the drug tests in the build-up and after that fight.

The only reason Fury agreed to the backdated ban was to avoid court and being out longer, he still maintains he is innocent.

[Robbie Barrett]

He passed all the drug tests in the build-up and after that fight.

The only reason Fury agreed to the backdated ban was to avoid court and being out longer, he still maintains he is innocent.

UKAD wouldn't be able to ban/punish without an admission of guilt. He's already admitted it.

[TheBigLug]

So Hammer realistically should have gone on to fight for a world title already as Fury is now a confirmed drug cheat.

Maybe it’s important to draw a line under this, I guess it explains why Fury’s hair fell out and he got morbidly obese upon stopping training as well as Hughie Fury’s acne, all the tell tale signs were there. As if two guys in the same stable testing positive wasn’t a clarification already ! Coupled with the fact the father and uncle actually has been busted for selling steroids.

He was still clean when he beat Wlad though, passed all the tests. I know that hurts, but it's the truth.

[Vinnykin]

UKAD wouldn't be able to ban/punish without an admission of guilt. He's already admitted it.

When did he admit it. The official statement from Hennessy Sports says otherwise and they are innocent.

.@Tyson_Fury & @hughiefury have proven their innocence

Athletes proven to be drugs cheats get a 4 year automatic ban & certainly not backdated

Reason they agreed to backdated period of ineligibility compromise is so they can focus on boxing & not be in court for next 2 years

— Hennessy Sports (@HennessySports) 12 December 2017

[Robbie Barrett]

When did he admit it. The official statement from Hennessy Sports says otherwise and they are innocent.

.@Tyson_Fury & @hughiefury have proven their innocence

Athletes proven to be drugs cheats get a 4 year automatic ban & certainly not backdated

Reason they agreed to backdated period of ineligibility compromise is so they can focus on boxing & not be in court for next 2 years

— Hennessy Sports (@HennessySports) 12 December 2017

Agreeing to the deal/plea bargain is the admission. UKAD can't hand punishments to innocent people.

He also says they have proven their innocence. Which we know simply isn't true.

[Vinnykin]

Agreeing to the deal/plea bargain is the admission. UKAD can't hand punishments to innocent people.

He also says they have proven their innocence. Which we know simply isn't true.

If you are giving 2 options, agree to a backdated ban and get on with your career and make millions in the next year, then retire......OR, go to court at massive time and cost, when you have already lost 2 years, so it could be 4 years out the ring.

What would you choose? Fury can't be out any longer, this is in no way an admission of guilt, it's common sense.

[Robbie Barrett]

If you are giving 2 options, agree to a backdated ban and get on with your career and make millions in the next year, then retire......OR, go to court at massive time and cost, when you have already lost 2 years, so it could be 4 years out the ring.

What would you choose? Fury can't be out any longer, this is in no way an admission of guilt, it's common sense.

It is an admission of guilt. This is effectively a plea bargain. Admit it and we'll give you less punishment.


"The Respondents have waived their rights to a hearing on the charges, accepted the findings
at paragraphs 1.1 and 1.2 above (which amounts to an admission for the purposes of UK
ADR Article 7.7.4), and acceded to the consequences set out at paragraphs 2 and 3, above.
Subject only to paragraph 4.3, below, each of the Parties hereby waives its/his rights to
appeal against or otherwise challenge this decision in any forum, whether pursuant to UK
ADR Article 13 or otherwise."

https://www.ukad.org.uk/assets/uploa...ughie_Fury.pdf