Tyson Fury: as innocent now as he has ever been.

[soul_survivor]

Only a moron would see it as an admission of guilt that a fight be turned to a NC.

They had him over a barrel. What they really wanted to do was nullify his status as the Lineal champion. He outwitted them, almost turned the tide. Almost, but not quite. Fear of a counter case is the only thing that stopped them going after his Lineal status.

I am sure now every measure will be taken to make it impossible for Tyson to be framed again. It is a shame that he lost two prime years just for telling the truth.

Anthony Joshua is clearly on PEDs. It is not even debatable. CLEARLY. Anyone who would say otherwise is a brainwashed sycophant. To falsely accuse Tyson Fury, and drag his name through the mud? When AJ is strolling about looking like a bodybuilder? People need to wake up.

They could still go after Tyson's Lineal status. Don't be surprised if they do. Providing he can get back to 70% of his best, he'll be back at the top regardless.

Let the good times roll.

You have lost the plot.

Fury has not been proven of anything. He doped but the punishment has been back dates and UKADs handling of the whole thing has been terrible. The Wlad fight should never have gone ahead, the investigation should have been completed 2 years ago and Fury should have been banned back then.

Let's hope he doesnt do this again. And lets hope UKAD is greatly overhauled.

[BodiesInFlight]

Fans claiming Fury is clean as a whistle while making baseless accusations about other boxers that have never been banned.

Classic.

[Robbie Barrett]

He accepted the deal on the nandrolone charge in return for UKAD not charging him with refusing a test, which could have got him a 4 year ban.

What's happened with the ******* charge? There's no mention of it. On the UKAD website people have been banned for 18 months+ for cannabis. Could another ban be incoming?

[LacedUp]

Keyword "HAVE"

The official document that the Fury's agreed to say it's an admission.

"The Respondents have waived their rights to a hearing on the charges, accepted the findings
at paragraphs 1.1 and 1.2 above (which amounts to an admission for the purposes of UK
ADR Article 7.7.4), and acceded to the consequences set out at paragraphs 2 and 3, above.
Subject only to paragraph 4.3, below, each of the Parties hereby waives its/his rights to
appeal against or otherwise challenge this decision in any forum, whether pursuant to UK
ADR Article 13 or otherwise."

https://www.ukad.org.uk/assets/uploa...ughie_Fury.pdf

Each of Hughie Fury and Tyson Fury (together, the Respondents) denies the anti-doping rule
violations asserted against them in the Nandrolone Proceedings, and alternatively denies
that he bears any fault or negligence for the reported presence of the elevated levels of
nandrolone metabolites in his system on the relevant dates in February 2015.

Refused to take a drugs test here:

UKAD has also asserted that Tyson Fury committed an anti-doping rule violation within the
meaning of UK ADR Article 2.3, in that he refused or failed without compelling justification to
submit to sample collection on 7 September 2016, for which he is liable to be banned for
four years (the Refusal Proceedings).

As I said, was about to be banned for four years but you want him to satisfy your hater needs by spending millions on court proceedings instead of getting on with his career.

Boring, predictable behaviour from some fat internet nerd.

[Tony Trick-Pony]

The only fool here is you. Some internet nerd who thinks Fury should take some weird kind of moral high ground and spend millions on a legal battle instead of resuming his career straight away.

Go away you nerd.