LomachenkGOAT would clean out 147

[ruedboy]

If manny can move up and do damage at 147 so can loma. Hes more skilled than manny, just has less power.

Pac had success at 147, but he was never the threat he was at the lighter weights. At 127 Pac was a force of nature, just like Duran at 135. Both guys moved up for big money fights but their legacy suffered. I hope Lomachenko doesn't do the same thing.
"IF you're not struggling to make the weight, you're in the wrong divison".

[RussB23]

so a smaller shorter lomachenko who has a reach disadvantage by like 9 inches game plan is to outbox thurman by dancing and moving around him? not to mention the raw brick power that thurman has on the outside.

RussTBE. are you ****ing serious? that has the be the most ret@rded gameplan ever for lomachenko.

Its only a 4 inch reach disadvantage and thurman is around 5'8. You dont have to have a longer reach to outbox someone. Rigo just had a 3 inch reach advantage over loma and had no success with it. Its all about defense and movement and how you box. And loma is a better boxer than thurman.

[RussB23]

how are people now confusing 126 and 130 fighters with 147 fighters? the fighters are very very weak at 126 & 130 compared to 147 (forget size) just from a talent prospective. it's no contest just on talent alone.

do you really think jason freaking SOSA or walters are better then porter? jason freaking sosa?

whooohahahahaha!

broner had a show at 130/135

everyone demanded and screamed at him to move up to 147.

not just for the size but better fighters.

lol @ comparing broner to a goat like loma.

[Godsfly]

Its only a 4 inch reach disadvantage and thurman is around 5'8. You dont have to have a longer reach to outbox someone. Rigo just had a 3 inch reach advantage over loma and had no success with it. Its all about defense and movement and how you box. And loma is a better boxer than thurman.

rigo was dwarfed. tiny. old. done. the guy is 40 I do not believe rigo is 37. he looks at least 40. they asked him, is this your real age rigo are you older? his response was like "don't worry about what my real age is" and laughed it off. (i think it's a boxingvoice vid)

and i am not just saying this right now i have an entire thread saying the exact thing before the fight even happened and comments saying the same exact thing before the fight was even announced. i already knew the outcome. don't talk to me about a tiny old rigo when talking about younger bigger fighters that have way way more to offer at this point like thurman. thurman wouldn't be moving up to face lomachenko. thurman has a 15 inch reach advantage over loma. ok ok ok it's called exaggerating. thurman doesn't have long arms for his frame but yet and still share a 4 to 4 & half reach advantage over loma. he's bigger then loma in all categories.


if your reasoning why loma will beat thurman is because "rigo loss" you are absolutely fooled.......

[Godsfly]

lol @ comparing broner to a goat like loma.

what has loma done to be goat? please explain.


don't run...........lets have a honest discussion about these things

[Godsfly]

this motha said a goat like loma?

[john l]

Hes not that undersized and hes more skilled than anyone there. Only guys i see beating him at WW are crawford or Spence. People will say hes too small but thats not true at all. Hes 5'7 and probably walks around 145-155

Take it easy!!!!!!!They are weight classes for reason and not everones body can move up multiple classes.He the best PFP but he AINT BEATING SPENCE,THRUMAN OR CRAWFORD or any other top 140-`147 pounder.

[john l]

Pac had success at 147, but he was never the threat he was at the lighter weights. At 127 Pac was a force of nature, just like Duran at 135. Both guys moved up for big money fights but their legacy suffered. I hope Lomachenko doesn't do the same thing.
"IF you're not struggling to make the weight, you're in the wrong divison".

Good point stay where your GREAT.Guys will come win a few titles make it dif to duck and he will get big fights.Without roids I don't see him being that good past 135 and id like to see him make 25 def at 130 where he is at his ultimate.

[Godsfly]

I asked you....how is loma gonna beat thurman. "dance, move around him, body shots" dancing all the way to a decision huh.

you know what ,**** it.

i am gonna starve myself and get to 130 beating the hell out of sosa so i can be called the GOAT.


I mean just **** it.

[RussB23]

rigo was dwarfed. tiny. old. done. the guy is 40 I do not believe rigo is 37. he looks at least 40. they asked him, is this your real age rigo are you older? his response was like "don't worry about what my real age is" and laughed it off. (i think it's a boxingvoice vid)

and i am not just saying this right now i have an entire thread saying the exact thing before the fight even happened and comments saying the same exact thing before the fight was even announced. i already knew the outcome. don't talk to me about a tiny old rigo when talking about younger bigger fighters that have way way more to offer at this point like thurman. thurman wouldn't be moving up to face lomachenko. thurman has a 15 inch reach advantage over loma. ok ok ok it's called exaggerating. thurman doesn't have long arms for his frame but yet and still share a 4 to 4 & half reach advantage over loma. he's bigger then loma in all categories.


if your reasoning why loma will beat thurman is because "rigo loss" you are absolutely fooled.......

I was just saying reach advantage doesnt really matter that much if someone is a superior technician.