Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A CONCISE Look How LOMACHENKO Is Technically INFERIOR TO MAYWEATHER JR. P4P 130lbs

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by LalinPromotions View Post
    Blasphemous, first, Brian de Palma is a bonafide gee, if you knew anything about Scarface you'd know..

    Lalin flew the cuckoos nest with these guys, and they took him to some magical place....he went from Attica to become a King.. true story





    But how do you betray the only people that ever cared for you?

    Huh?

    How do you do that?

    Here come the pain!

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Ganstaz003 View Post
      I asked you a simple question. You failed to answer thus far. What exactly is your point when you claim:

      "Lomachenko lost against Salido"?

      As in, what are you trying to infer from that?

      Do you have a mental / cognitive disorder by any chance?
      because staying undefeated has no value, correct, or else why does that bother you? You want to make a case that Loma was robbed against Salido, make the thread, if not, then as many claim, Loma wasn't good enough to beat Salido. Could've gotten a DRAW at least

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by anthonydavid11 View Post
        But how do you betray the only people that ever cared for you?

        Huh?

        How do you do that?

        Here come the pain!
        I was going to use Pachanga, but he preferred to stay in the world of Boogie Nights.. he's a hired man to catch

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by LalinPromotions View Post
          because staying undefeated has no value, correct, or else why does that bother you? You want to make a case that Loma was robbed against Salido, make the thread, if not, then as many claim, Loma wasn't good enough to beat Salido. Could've gotten a DRAW at least
          So are you claiming / inferring that based on Lomachenko losing to salido, staying undefeated has no value?

          If so, how do you arrive at that conclusion?

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by LalinPromotions View Post
            opinions, aren't we all sensitive? #130lbs #fantasy fights

            beating a seasoned Super Bantamweight is enough to believe that Loma would fare well against a 130lb Floyd? Does Dan enough know about reach!?


            Fat dan needs to shut up, I love me some Loma and I have #1 P4P, but Pretty boy Floyd beats him to near death, he was only landing about 9 punches a round against Rigo and Floyd is better offensively and defensively that Rigo

            Comment


            • #36
              Technically inferior, u should learn more about boxing. Lomachenko's reflexes, his ability to dictate distance and pace of fight, his ability to use his offense to create his defence, his punch selection are all things we haven't seen in a long, long time, maybe since Roberto Duran. At the same number of fights, Floyd wasn't doing what Loma is doing right now. At the same number of fights, Floyd wasn't the technical genius he turned out to be today so certainly we have to give Loma some time and see where he is 20 or 30 fights from now. I don't know what Fat Dan had for lunch but Loma isn't anything close to an all time great 'cos he needs a body of work for anyone to make that assessment. Not saying he is better, but he is certainly ahead of Floyd when comparing the same number of fights.

              Comment


              • #37
                Floyd in rigo’s body would have had a chance to win that fight, let alone his own. imo. Floyd is way mentally tougher and could overcome adversity whenever it presents itself.
                If floyd in rigo’s body, the smaller guy, gets put in there with a great offensive fighter/aggressor like loma he would’ve punch him in the nose in round one, make a statement and make his opponent respect his punch. Which results to the aggressor being hesistant for the next rounds. Everything then on is cake.

                Rigo was even showboating lmao!
                It just invites the bigger fighter to harass you more.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Mayweather is a lock for top 5 p4p all time, even haters admit that. He has a strong argument for greatest boxer of all time. Its unfortunate for all his contemporaries that they must be compared to him. Loma is very good but he is not among the elite of all time like mayweather.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by whirlout View Post
                    Technically inferior, u should learn more about boxing. Lomachenko's reflexes, his ability to dictate distance and pace of fight, his ability to use his offense to create his defence, his punch selection are all things we haven't seen in a long, long time, maybe since Roberto Duran. At the same number of fights, Floyd wasn't doing what Loma is doing right now. At the same number of fights, Floyd wasn't the technical genius he turned out to be today so certainly we have to give Loma some time and see where he is 20 or 30 fights from now. I don't know what Fat Dan had for lunch but Loma isn't anything close to an all time great 'cos he needs a body of work for anyone to make that assessment. Not saying he is better, but he is certainly ahead of Floyd when comparing the same number of fights.
                    Why do you guys keep going by the number of fights when comparing them?

                    How about we compare them by age: Mayweather at 30 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> loma at 30

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by whirlout View Post
                      Not saying he is better, but he is certainly ahead of Floyd when comparing the same number of fights.
                      ahead when comparing the same number of fights?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP