Lomachenko Beats the Spoilers

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sunny31
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2006
    • 5780
    • 450
    • 35
    • 128,703

    #11
    I was very impressed with how prepared Lomachenko was from a strategical point of view and his ability to execute it. He was also thinking his way through, he would disregard things that didn't work and reuse things that did. This is the first time I have really seen a top boxing IQ, the thing with the holding is a great example of this, he really put Rigo into a box and made the referee make a decision.

    Comment

    • RussB23
      Loma Crew
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2015
      • 4329
      • 154
      • 66
      • 12,195

      #12
      Originally posted by anthonydavid11
      That's it, man.

      Rigo just couldn't make a stinker of this one no matter what.

      Loma wouldn't have it.
      Absolutely pathetic display from rigo he straight quit . He talked so much smack too.

      Comment

      • RedZmaja
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Dec 2015
        • 758
        • 39
        • 51
        • 7,424

        #13
        Originally posted by D4thincarnation
        Yeah, everything he tried wasn't working, must be so demoralizing.
        To me it was surprising how little adjustments he was able to make. He just doesn't seem to have any close-range game.

        You take his long range pot-shoting game and his left hand away and he has nothing.

        I already said years ago that his style won't age well.

        Comment

        • NEETzsche
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Oct 2011
          • 8389
          • 283
          • 176
          • 29,441

          #14
          I don't think it would work against a guy like Andre Ward who clamps the hands then suddenly releases them and launches a left hook. Loma's guard would be way off to defend against that

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP