Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Generates Big Rating For ESPN

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by North Star View Post
    It was a great card. I liked what I saw from Chris Diaz. Looks like we got another Puerto Rican fighter to keep an eye on. He looked sharp and had power in both hands.

    Lomachenko was just spectacular! Crazy to see him make another elite fighter quit like that. He's from another planet!
    What was so great about the card? 2/3 of the card was Stevenson and Conlan vs 2 journeyman. What’s so great about that?

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by jmrf4435 View Post
      pbc had subpar fights, and inconsistent
      Even with subpar fights and way less featured coverage, all of PBC ESPN primetime fights out performed all but two of these top rank cards (Manny, and last night).

      Some of what you all post here isn't connected to reality lol

      Thurman Callazo
      Garcia Paulie
      LSC Mares

      Are just a few fights that pulled bigger ratings than pretty much all of these Top Rank cards. That "featured" coverage on sportscaster and the mini docs are two things that never happened with the PBC cards. Why? Idk but it's not the samething to compare the two.
      Last edited by Butch.McRae; 12-10-2017, 02:20 PM.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by THEFRESHBRAWLER View Post
        Stop with the metrics lol and just tell us how many dàmn viewers watched
        I noticed that too lol those are percentages (of ages ranges) of the viewing audience. But for some reason they wont post the raw numbers for these cards.

        Comment


        • #24
          The heisman trophy award show on espn was right before the card which helped the viewership a lot. Ol sneaky bob

          Comment


          • #25
            If that was a PBC card, everyone would be crying how it was so boring it will make people not watch boxing again. Its all in how you frame it. I bet you the ratings went down as the fight went along. Just like a Lara fight. Great on paper, but not terribly exciting to watch. People were leaving the stands after the third round.

            Comment


            • #26
              And that was competing against an HBO card. I don't think Pac-Horn had that.

              Comment


              • #27
                wtf does 1.5 mean??

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Butch.McRae View Post
                  I noticed that too lol those are percentages (of ages ranges) of the viewing audience. But for some reason they wont post the raw numbers for these cards.
                  Those are neilson numbers. They take days to calculate if not a week.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by DamonJJ View Post
                    Those are neilson numbers. They take days to calculate if not a week.
                    I obviously know that but we never get the updated raw numbers for ESPN.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Butch.McRae View Post
                      I obviously know that but we never get the updated raw numbers for ESPN.
                      I guess I usually see them on here a few days later http://www.boxingscene.com/espns-top...-night--122456

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP