Walters was the "boogeyman" a few years ago and people said Lomachenko wasn't legit until he fought him. Well, after that fight, Walters was considered damaged goods/a bum who didn't take boxing serious.
I am wondering if anybody feels the same way about Rigo? Does anybody feel that Rigo is damaged goods, or should we finally give Lomachenko credit for a solid win?
I am wondering if anybody feels the same way about Rigo? Does anybody feel that Rigo is damaged goods, or should we finally give Lomachenko credit for a solid win?
Comment