Both have better resumes than Crawford and it could be argued that GGG beat Canelo and vice versa. So, what's the deal with Crawford being p4p 1
Why is Crawford ranked ahead of GGG and Canelo?
Collapse
-
I have GG and Canelo 1 and 2 respectively (i thought GG won a close one)
They both elevated themselves in that fight imo.
Crawford in 3. Loma 4. Both those guys have good wins, and they look the goods, but need that defining opponent now (no Rigo does not count). -
-
Skill. People are giving him credit for his skill level which is top class. GGG is my favorite fighter but I rank him behind Crawford. Crawford is the total package.Comment
-
Why doesn't Rigo count?Comment
-
Yes, but GGG has the better resume. That's like saying Mikey should be ranked higher than Thurman due to being more technical but it is clear that Keith has the superior resumeComment
-
The question should rather be, why are Golovkin and Canelo even on the P4P list? Crawford has managed to be the one unbeatable guy in multiple divisions that no one there could mess with, while Golovkin and Canelo are not even the definitive champs of one division and have plenty of opponents around that could possibly beat them. They simply don't have Crawford's aura of invincibility and he's not a primitive slugger like them.Comment
-
Comment
Comment