Comments Thread For: Lomachenko: Crawford is Boxing's Best Fighter, Pound-for-Pound

[Ray*]

Rigo and Loma are both better defenders and their ring iq is on the same or slightly higher level than Crawford's.

Again I respectfully disagree with you.

[Pigeons]

Thats all well and good, but who has he beaten? Postol? after The iceman your looking at a bunch of C- level guys and Midgets from lower weight classes.

I know its not Crawfords fault for taking over a very weak division, and he's obviously an elite talent but let's all calm down with the p4p no.1 stuff lol.

IF he beats Thurman or Spence then its clear hes no.1 IMO

Gamboa, Postol, Indongo. All undefeated. Gamboa had unified 126 and won interim titles at 130 and 135. Postol stopped Matthysse for a title at 140. Indongo beat two guys in their home countries to unify 140. His KO vs. Troyanovsky is one the most vicious in recent memory.

[gamble1]

Rigo and Loma are both better defenders and their ring iq is on the same or slightly higher level than Crawford's.

i disagree lamenchecko is the only fighter in boxing history to only have barely 10 fights and on the third fight lose and still be ranked pound for pound best he being spoon fed he is no real champ the only crediable fighter was russel and the you fight walters who had year lay off with no tune up fight he is not legeit

[Drew Bundini Br]

Not Canelo, bro

CANELO ranks 2nd because of his body of work is better than most. Look at list of fighters he faced

[evets]

Rigo and Loma are both better defenders and their ring iq is on the same or slightly higher level than Crawford's.

Crawford has been able to plan for any opponent and adapt multiple times in fight to win. As much as I love Loma and Rigo they don't. They did in the AM;s but not in the Pro's. Maybe haven't been up against someone they needed to but arguably Loma needed to adapt to Salido and didn't he has admitted as much after. He didn't listen to his corner and he did not adapt to Salido.

[Main Source]

Wise guy? Lol, you're the one with the ******est profile name on this website, and you have 4 months on this site soooo... I'm not gonna waste my time

Stop ****ing around and tell us who has the #1 spot on your little list.

[JimmyD729]

CANELO ranks 2nd because of his body of work is better than most. Look at list of fighters he faced

Smaller/washed up fighters for the most part

[PrBoxing88]

P4P should be for Canelo, he has the better resume and just fought GGG.

[cali37]

Thats all well and good, but who has he beaten? Postol? after The iceman your looking at a bunch of C- level guys and Midgets from lower weight classes.

I know its not Crawfords fault for taking over a very weak division, and he's obviously an elite talent but let's all calm down with the p4p no.1 stuff lol.

IF he beats Thurman or Spence then its clear hes no.1 IMO

If not Crawford then who? He has the best argument to be p4p #1. 2 lineal titles, 1st undisputed champ since Hopkins beat De La Hoya and he finishes his biggest fights in impressive fashion. Who else has accolades that are better?

[SkillspayBills]

WW has 3 p4p level fights in Spence (10), Thurman (6-9), and Crawford (1). Mannnnnnnnnnnnnnnn the next couple years will be something else.