Why didn't Loma move up in weight to fight Mikey?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
-
Or even at 140. If Rigondeaux can move up two classes, its not unreasonable for Lomachenko to do the same.
They're the exact same size height and Mikey has a little more more reach. 2.5" which is 1.25" per arm. Zero advantage here.This is a joke right? Mikey is saying he is getting too big for 135 while Loma is still at 130, Mikey has a height and reach advantage - how are they the same size when Loma walks around at 138?
I agree that Loma shouldn't be p4p#1 if he beats Rigo because of the 2 weight classes, but Mikey is objectively bigger than Loma, in every aspect.
How do you know what Lomachenko walks around at?Comment
-
Loma has already moved up 1 weight class, from 126 to 130, so 2 weight classes would be 135.Or even at 140. If Rigondeaux can move up two classes, its not unreasonable for Lomachenko to do the same.
They're the exact same size height and Mikey has a little more more reach. 2.5" which is 1.25" per arm. Zero advantage here.
How do you know what Lomachenko walks around at?
Loma said his walk around weight was 138, he said it in an interview with Boxingscene last year in Novemeber.Comment
-
Why didn't Mikey move to 140 to fight Crawford instead of Broner? Why didn't Mikey remain at 135 and take a fight with Linares?Comment
-
-
They aren't the exact same size dumbass... they have stood right next to eachother and Mikey was visibly taller.Or even at 140. If Rigondeaux can move up two classes, its not unreasonable for Lomachenko to do the same.
They're the exact same size height and Mikey has a little more more reach. 2.5" which is 1.25" per arm. Zero advantage here.
How do you know what Lomachenko walks around at?Comment
-
yeah to fight who? its a difference in moving up to fight someone who is the best in a division, than just moving up for no apparent reason, would have loved to see loma vs santa cruz and others tho he would have won. he left 126 fast as hell.Comment
Comment