Comments Thread For: Joseph Parker's Promoter Erupts, Tears Apart Anthony Joshua

[Holler]

Tearing Anthony Joshua apart was a bad move on Higgins part. Not only has it ruined the chances of a fight with Parker, tearing people apart is illegal in the UK and I expect the Metropolitan Police will be having a stern word with this fellow.

[Mammoth]

The fight hasn't fallen through though yet so....

[Jewish-Reptile]

It will be on PPV so yes its a bad fight, also...what credibility? he just fought the corpse of samuel peter and the corpse of kevin johnsons corpse?
what has he done to deserve a title shot? getting a SD agaisnt a shot delboy?

Also yes i root agaisnt charr getting the fight, hes clearly juicing.

I'm not particularly bothered if Charr gets the fight, in fact I'd prefer it over a potential Whyte fight. I wouldn't watch either live I'd tune in to Youtube for the KO and likely watch the fight in the following days as I did Takam.

Pulev is ranked in the top six, as I said he brings with him a certain amount of credibility. This fight will not happen regardless, Pulev with his robust jab and size will certainly be overlooked. In all likelihood Charr is far more likely as he represents no challenge whatsoever, as Whyte also does not either.

A split decision, find out the nationality of the judge who gave the fight to Chisora, whoever it was most certainly need to be struck off and put on indefinite suspension. Did you not watch that fight ?

[mattr]

Parker is garbage. Bookies have him close to a 10/1 underdog. Him and his d-bag manager doing all they can to talk this fight up because they know it's their one shot at a massive payday, then back down under.

[lolasif]

If Higgins is so sure that Joshua is unwilling to fight Parker then surely he should just call his bluff and accept the offer on the table.

[mlac]

I'm not particularly bothered if Charr gets the fight, in fact I'd prefer it over a potential Whyte fight. I wouldn't watch either live I'd tune in to Youtube for the KO and likely watch the fight in the following days as I did Takam.

Pulev is ranked in the top six, as I said he brings with him a certain amount of credibility. This fight will not happen regardless, Pulev with his robust jab and size will certainly be overlooked. In all likelihood Charr is far more likely as he represents no challenge whatsoever, as Whyte also does not either.

A split decision, find out the nationality of the judge who gave the fight to Chisora, whoever it was most certainly need to be struck off and put on indefinite suspension. Did you not watch that fight ?

I bet and won money on pulev via decision, it doesnt matter if he won a sd or a ud, he still doesnt deserve being anywhere near a title shot off the back off that.

He hasnt beaten a single legitimate opponent in years/ever, (unless you rate ustinov / dimtrenko) just journeyman and bringing out corpses of retired 40+ year olds. its embarrassing.

whats more embarrassing is his stance, dude thinks hes riding a harley davidson or some schit.
Pulev would be a step down from takam. Yes he has one of the divisions better jab's, but thats literally all he has.

Are you trying to say rankings bring credibility? whyte is no.1 in the WBC FFS

[Jewish-Reptile]

I bet and won money on pulev via decision, it doesnt matter if he won a sd or a ud, he still doesnt deserve being anywhere near a title shot off the back off that.

He hasnt beaten a single legitimate opponent in years/ever, (unless you rate ustinov / dimtrenko) just journeyman and bringing out corpses of retired 40+ year olds. its embarrassing.

whats more embarrassing is his stance, dude thinks hes riding a harley davidson or some schit.
Pulev would be a step down from takam. Yes he has one of the divisions better jab's, but thats literally all he has.

Are you trying to say rankings bring credibility? whyte is no.1 in the WBC FFS

Are you on crack, seriously ? How the fück is Pulev a step down from Takam. You're British right ?

TBRB, I give Ring and Boxrcec little credibility.

[Travycat]

I think the problem is they want one of the old style Klitschko contracts where they get an immediate rematch should they lose. And he has no interest in fighting Parker twice in a row. He wants to unify the following match. He’s making it sound like they’re giving AJ the rematch if he loses, but it sounds like they’re trying to make it both ways. If Parker’s side removes the rematch clause, I’m sure it goes forward fine.

[daggum]

stop quibbling over millions of dollars!

[mlac]

Are you on crack, seriously ? How the fück is Pulev a step down from Takam. You're British right ?

TBRB, I give Ring and Boxrcec little credibility.

Rankings mean nothing. Takam was going to points before a BS stoppage. pulev would of been put away before the half way point.

Also i would put money on takam to beat pulev, are you some kind of Bulgarian bum boy bro?