Comments Thread For: Roach: Canelo Never Wanted Rematch; Cotto Won Their Fight

[snoopy360]

Wow Freddie must be going blind. Cotto lost no need for a rematch. Move on....

[lakerstekkenn]

I don't know why trainers and fighters do this every-time a boxer really loses a fight, they always come up with this nonsense that no one ever beat them or they got cheated or had injuries before and their fights.

Then they think Boxing fans are going to believe this crap, no sane person except their loyal fan base cares, what fake excuse they come up with anyway, they are just making themselves look foolish.

Roach Canelo beat Cotto fair and square with no robbery in a back and forth sometimes close fight with Canelo winning it and at the end this fight wasn't close at all.

Roach Floyd beat Pc real easy in their fight and it wasn't close at all.

No excuses from any of theses trainers and Boxers, I don't want to hear any excuses at all those fights were judged correctly, no robbery's at all.

[daggum]

Imo Canelo dominated Lara & at LEAST deserved his draw vs GGG.

I think too many posters on here that claim ggg was robbed, don't actually judge fights using the 4 basic criteria to judge fights,they say things regularly to PROVE they don't judge fights even SEMI fairly. They say it all the time when they claim the challenger needs to "take the champs belt" ,"Canelo ROBBED ggg","Canelo lost because he ran" etc.

Judges NEVER are supposed to use ANY of the criteria these fanbois claim.

They're supposed to judge fights as each rd being its own fight,& which fighter is the most EFFECTIVE when analyzed against his opponent using the 4 basic criteria set forth by the Nevada state commission. Ggg was only more EFFECTIVE at 1 criteria of the 4 (agression) but even in this area his agression was ENTIRELY ineffective,as despite canelo supposedly "fighting for short amounts" he landed the MAJORITY of all the best punches,way better accuracy,& miles better DEFENSE which is 1 of the 4 criteria also.He also
managed 2 land more power shots & 45 shots to gggs chin to gggs 8,& 44 body shots to gggs 8.

Watch any mayweather fight, then Canelo vs GGG,& it'll instantly tell you why I think Canelo won. Mayweather was considered as big a runner as they come, every single fight he: clinched non stop,used elbows nonstop,& most the time" barely fought for short amounts a rd as they claim now about canelo",yet he still went 49-0 & rarely lost any cards.

Because per the rules,he barely exchanged punches yet his Defense was impeccable & he still managed to consistently outland his opponents.

how was he ineffective? he doubled canelo in lands. sounds like we got another he didnt knock out canelo so canelo wins argument.

pretty sure landing more punches makes you the winner in clean punches and makes you the ring general. not sure how you can win those categories cause you land a nice shot or 2 in the round while eating constant punches and ggg was landing solid shots for the most part. these were not floyd vs pac taps.

you seem to be conflating accuracy with substance. so if a guy lands 3 out of 5 punches and the other guy lands 8 out of 20 the guy who landed 3 wins clean punching? wins defense? he got hit more so no he did not. thats not how you judge. you judge on what actually happened. you cant hypothetically stretch out canelo's accuracy and say well if he threw 20 punches he would have landed 12 punches therefore he did better. the reason he didnt throw more is cause he couldn't. the same logic applies to defense. yes he avoided punches at a higher rate and if you reduced that down to each guy throwing the same number of punches canelo would have had better defense cept thats not what happened in reality. reality is he got hit more so he didnt win defense. no need for hypotheticals.

floyd has nothing to do with canelo vs ggg. you have to judge what happened when ggg fought canelo not what happened in other fights. comparative scoring is not effective judging. compare ggg to canelo not what floyd did to canelo.

ggg doubled canelo in lands. compubox is simply not accurate. a lot of those body shots you are touting simply landed on the arms. thats not a clean shot. jacobs fanboys tried the same argument. if clottey was a bigger star you would have people saying he beat pac cause he landed the better shots on average.

[kushking]

how was he ineffective? he doubled canelo in lands. sounds like we got another he didnt knock out canelo so canelo wins argument.

You reply to me with some extremely long reply but start it out with this gem of all fallacies while claiming im basing my pov on "he didn't knock him out so he lost" ,so I didn't even bother to read the rest of this horseshît response as I know from experience your 1 of the ******est most deluded fanbois on this site when it involves your fav guy,who will make ****** claims like what I highlighted above.

Gtfoh

Ps I could've sworn your the same moron claiming Ortiz wasn't at fault but rather wilder 4 him pissing dirty,if im wrong at least Im SURE you were the dipstick making equally ****** fanboi claims about him & others you hate.

[VatoMulatto]

Freddie sounds like a sore loser, Canelo won that fight fair and square. It was competitive but still a clear win for the Mexican.

[jazluvr]

Fredie sounds like a sore loser, Canelo won that fight fair and square. It was competitive but still a clear win for the Mexican.

I agree, and Freddie does this a lot. Good fight, but 'Nelo won it. Not worth a rematch. i think Cotto would even lose worse in a rematch. Canelo just gets better with every fight. He's still very young and growing and learning 'on the job'.

[kushking]

how was he ineffective? he doubled canelo in lands. sounds like we got another he didnt knock out canelo so canelo wins argument.

pretty sure landing more punches makes you the winner

Only a LITERAL ****** would claim "ggg landed double his shots"

ANYONE this ****** should stop watching boxing & focus on your special ed studies after you get dropped off right to your door by the short bus.
[IMG]https://image.ibb.co/cszJna/*****_12.gif[/IMG]

[icha]

i dont even think that cotto or canelo are interested in the rematch anymore, roach needs to just let it go...
it was a good fight but is better for boxing if they all move on..

[Nightfall]

Of course you did, we all know you hate Canelo. Get real though lil Freddie Cotto clearly lost.

What made you think that I hate alvared you idiot ?

[Nightfall]

of course you did, you swore Cotto would out-box the Ginger, little did you know, that by Cotto giving a good account of himself against Mayweather, compared to Canelo's performance, does not equate/translate to Cotto doing the same against GGGinger....thus you trying to convinced yourself Cotto won just save face GTFO.

First of all Mayweather whoopped them both. Cotto fought like a warrior and canelo quit when he saw how good Mayweather was. Back to the fight. Canelo had the more affective shots on Cotto, but Cotto out punched alvared and clearly won a close decision