Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury Hits Back at Criticism From Chris Eubank Sr.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Adamjr91
    Ear fingerer
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2013
    • 4218
    • 170
    • 550
    • 14,320

    #11
    Well said Fury.

    Comment

    • hugh grant
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2006
      • 30469
      • 2,189
      • 907
      • 105,596

      #12
      If eubank meant fury hasn't learnt since beating wlad he may have a point.
      You grow into being a champ. Josh has.

      Comment

      • Sid-Knee
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2015
        • 18249
        • 1,091
        • 731
        • 155,532

        #13
        So Fury can downplay AJ until the cows come home, but no one is allowed to do the same with him?

        ****ing hypocrite.

        Comment

        • bluepete
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Sep 2016
          • 1979
          • 64
          • 0
          • 8,844

          #14
          He's got a right to he's opinion, but he's position looks abit silly since he claims he's sons the new Ray Leonard when he's fought no one.

          Comment

          • ShoulderRoll
            Join The Great Resist
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 56243
            • 10,157
            • 5,034
            • 763,445

            #15
            Eubank Sr is not wrong.

            Fury's victory over Klitschko should have been something to build on. It was a great learning experience and he should have taken those lessons, improved on them, and become an even more formidable fighter.

            Instead he did implode and pretty much threw it all away.

            Comment

            • P4Pdunny
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jul 2017
              • 8097
              • 144
              • 142
              • 58,715

              #16
              fury is a hypocrite

              Comment

              • jas
                Voice of Reason
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2005
                • 22525
                • 936
                • 912
                • 1,059,614

                #17
                Fury jus talks. People are tired of it..bragging about one win..a victory over a wlad who was coming off a bad showing vs jennings. Lets see if fury has longevity. He talks about history a lot...the greats had longevity

                Comment

                • PRINCEKOOL
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2016
                  • 9829
                  • 1,856
                  • 1
                  • 88,155

                  #18
                  Tyson Fury won 1 fight, against Wladimir Kiltschko! (It was a great performance, but he hardly destroyed or demoralized Wladimir Kiltschko! And from my perspective? Tyson Fury was completely and utterly spooked by the share intensity of Wladimir Kiltschko during the build up for the rematch! (I am not sure why people ignore this! And give him some sort of pass!)...

                  I honestly believe Wladimir kiltschko was part of the reason, as to why Tyson Fury cracked under the pressure of being a very wanted man within the heavyweight division! (And this lead to him self sabotaging himself! Because in my opinion he cannot cope with being the man to beat! Even now he is talking as if he is the man to beat? Anthony Joshua is the man to beat! David Haye, Deontay Wilder....non of these guys are gunning for Tyson Fury! Because they know that Anthony Joshua is the man in form, and is Universally recognized as the premier heavyweight champion! These are the facts of the game right now!)...

                  Tyson Fury is a enigma, he is a talented fighter! But I would not call him a great champion, because he has made ZERO defenses of his titles! Chris Eubank Senior fought during one of the greatest era's of the middle & super-middle divisions, he has not only proven himself as a champion by making 19 defenses of his WBO Middle-Weight Championship! but he was a competitor in some of the most brutal testing fights in British boxing history! There is no man, born from his mother that can denied Chris Eubank Seniors credibility inside the ring! As a man or a fighter......

                  Tyson Fury in my opinion excels when he is the underdog, when he is chasing somebody out in front! (And he is now in that position once again!)...

                  Comment

                  • Holler
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2017
                    • 1453
                    • 109
                    • 324
                    • 17,897

                    #19
                    Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT
                    Fury achieved more in one fight than Eubank did in his entire career. Eubank was a paper WBO champ and never wanted any part of Jones Jr, Toney, McCallum, Nunn, McClellan etc. And that’s coming from a Brit!
                    Eubank was careful in who he fought and there was a lot of filler, but he also played a full role in some of the most brutal and exciting bouts of that era, especially with Benn and poor Michael Watson. He was a brave fighter in the ring and a good showman. I don't think he's so easily dismissed.

                    Comment

                    • RJJ-94-02=GOAT
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2017
                      • 28886
                      • 9,223
                      • 2,038
                      • 246,831

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Holler
                      Eubank was careful in who he fought and there was a lot of filler, but he also played a full role in some of the most brutal and exciting bouts of that era, especially with Benn and poor Michael Watson. He was a brave fighter in the ring and a good showman. I don't think he's so easily dismissed.
                      He had some great fights and was VERY tough and resilient however he was no world beater. Purely because of his popularity and unique character people assume he was some sort of legendary fighter when really he was just a minor belt holder that had some big domestic fights. His only real legit win’s were Benn and maybe Rocchigiani.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP