Comments Thread For: Brook Aims To Target Jermell Charlo, Jarrett Hurd, Erislandy Lara

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KidDinamita
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2013
    • 1316
    • 112
    • 1
    • 17,290

    #61
    I think Brook wants his eyes running on the floor now instead of broken eye sockets.

    Comment

    • Sledgeweather17
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2015
      • 3587
      • 154
      • 5
      • 34,855

      #62
      Originally posted by stealthradon


      Coming in to round 10 the scores were
      84-87
      86-85
      85-86

      These are the official scores.

      So how about you shut the fúck up, instead of accusing other people of lying?
      You know how easy it is to prove that you're lying? I don't even need to provide a link to prove it.

      Kell was stopped in the eleventh round, which means the scorecards you provided are totally impossible because 10 rounds would have to be scored, which means that at the least your scores should be in the 90s and not the 80s like you have it.

      Now that I've exposed your ******ity and dishonesty, let me provide a link just to cement it.

      Errol Spence Jr. and Kell Brook did not disappoint in their anticipated matchup, while George Groves finally earned a title during an entertaining weekend of boxing. Get caught up on the biggest fights around the world with Dan Rafael's scorecard.


      Scores were in FACT 97-92, 96-93, and 95-94, ALL IN FAVOUR OF ERROL SPENCE JNR!!!!

      Here's another link from THE GUARDIAN newspaper:

      Round-by-round updates: Errol Spence Jr stopped Kell Brook in the 11th round to capture the IBF welterweight title in Sheffield


      Shows exactly the same scorecards as ESPN, oh and the guardian's scorecard also reads in favour of Errol Spence at 96-93.

      Lol, you really thought people were dumb enough to believe those fake fanboy scorecards of yours?
      Last edited by Sledgeweather17; 11-28-2017, 06:58 AM.

      Comment

      • stealthradon
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2017
        • 3283
        • 108
        • 2
        • 30,404

        #63
        Originally posted by Sledgeweather17
        You know how easy it is to prove that you're lying? I don't even need to provide a link to prove it.

        Kell was stopped in the eleventh round, which means the scorecards you provided are totally impossible because 10 rounds would have to be scored, which means that at the least your scores should be in the 90s and not the 80s like you have it.

        Now that I've exposed your ******ity and dishonesty, let me provide a link just to cement it.

        Errol Spence Jr. and Kell Brook did not disappoint in their anticipated matchup, while George Groves finally earned a title during an entertaining weekend of boxing. Get caught up on the biggest fights around the world with Dan Rafael's scorecard.


        Scores were in FACT 97-92, 96-93, and 95-94, ALL IN FAVOUR OF ERROL SPENCE JNR!!!!

        Here's another link from THE GUARDIAN newspaper:

        Round-by-round updates: Errol Spence Jr stopped Kell Brook in the 11th round to capture the IBF welterweight title in Sheffield


        Shows exactly the same scorecards as ESPN, oh and the guardian's scorecard also reads in favour of Errol Spence at 96-93.

        Lol, you really thought people were dumb enough to believe those fake fanboy scorecards of yours?
        Are you able to read, you dumb motherfúcker? Are you?
        Let me quote myself, because, perhaps, if I repeat it, it might go into that thick idiotic skull of yours.

        "Coming in to round 10 the scores were
        84-87
        86-85
        85-86"

        Now tell me, what does that mean, you daft cúnt.
        Going in to the 10th round.. Do you understand these words then?
        Let me try to make it even easier for you.
        Until number girl, who had the number 10. Here's a helpful guide:

        That means the previous 9 rounds, ie. the rounds before the KD, as I stated in the post as well, that Brook was doing fine on the scorecards, and could have won from that point on.
        Do you understand this, or are you just too dumb?

        Comment

        • Sledgeweather17
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2015
          • 3587
          • 154
          • 5
          • 34,855

          #64
          Originally posted by stealthradon
          Are you able to read, you dumb motherfúcker? Are you?
          Let me quote myself, because, perhaps, if I repeat it, it might go into that thick idiotic skull of yours.

          "Coming in to round 10 the scores were
          84-87
          86-85
          85-86"

          Now tell me, what does that mean, you daft cúnt.
          Going in to the 10th round.. Do you understand these words then?
          Let me try to make it even easier for you.
          Until number girl, who had the number 10. Here's a helpful guide:

          That means the previous 9 rounds, ie. the rounds before the KD, as I stated in the post as well, that Brook was doing fine on the scorecards, and could have won from that point on.
          Do you understand this, or are you just too dumb?
          STILL!!! If the final scorecards were 97-92, 96-93, and 95-94 for Errol Spence, there is STILL no way the cards could have read what you claim they read going into the tenth.

          In other words, you are STILL blatantly lying. At no point in that fight, and certainly not going into the tenth, was Brook leading on the cards, or could have won that fight.

          You're full of shieeet!

          Comment

          • stealthradon
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Aug 2017
            • 3283
            • 108
            • 2
            • 30,404

            #65
            Originally posted by Sledgeweather17
            STILL!!! If the final scorecards were 97-92, 96-93, and 95-94 for Errol Spence, there is STILL no way the cards could have read what you claim they read going into the tenth.

            In other words, you are STILL blatantly lying. At no point in that fight, and certainly not going into the tenth, was Brook leading on the cards, or could have won that fight.

            You're full of shieeet!
            Let's do some basic maths here.
            If the scores were

            87-84 and the round was 10-8 it would be
            97-92

            86-85 and the round was 10-8 it would be
            96-93

            85-86 and the round was 10-8 it would be
            95-94

            Yes, Brook was leading on one card going into the tenth. That's a fact. And trailing by one point on another.

            The cards did read what I said, that's not a matter of opinion. It's not my fault you don't know about boxing nor simple addition.

            Comment

            • Redd Foxx
              Hittin' the heavy bag.
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2011
              • 22007
              • 1,180
              • 2,316
              • 1,257,197

              #66
              Originally posted by stealthradon


              Yeah, he sure presented facts by accusing me of being a liar.
              Are you going to do the right thing and apologize and acknowledge I was right?
              You said he was well ahead you goof, and that wasn't even the round he was finished in. Cut to the facts; you thought he was winning the fight until he was stopped. You were dead wrong and you're too shameless to let it go. What a joke.

              Comment

              • stealthradon
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2017
                • 3283
                • 108
                • 2
                • 30,404

                #67
                Originally posted by Redd Foxx
                You said he was well ahead you goof, and that wasn't even the round he was finished in. Cut to the facts; you thought he was winning the fight until he was stopped. You were dead wrong and you're too shameless to let it go. What a joke.
                I did not. I said he was well on the scorecards.
                I never said he was winning the fight. Where did I say so?
                I said, until that point he was doing quite well. Do you not acknowledge the fact that on two of the scorecards the difference until the KD was just one point? That means that without the KD, and it had been a round for Spence, and round 11 and 12 went to Brook, it would have been a draw.

                What the fúck am I wrong about, you idiot?
                Learn to fúcking read next time, before opening your big gob.

                Comment

                • Sledgeweather17
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jun 2015
                  • 3587
                  • 154
                  • 5
                  • 34,855

                  #68
                  Originally posted by stealthradon
                  Let's do some basic maths here.
                  If the scores were

                  87-84 and the round was 10-8 it would be
                  97-92

                  86-85 and the round was 10-8 it would be
                  96-93

                  85-86 and the round was 10-8 it would be
                  95-94

                  Yes, Brook was leading on one card going into the tenth. That's a fact. And trailing by one point on another.

                  The cards did read what I said, that's not a matter of opinion. It's not my fault you don't know about boxing nor simple addition.
                  Oh so now you goin back and sayin he was only leading on ONE card? Okay, at least you had the decency to correct your mistake.

                  Comment

                  • stealthradon
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Aug 2017
                    • 3283
                    • 108
                    • 2
                    • 30,404

                    #69
                    Originally posted by Sledgeweather17
                    Oh so now you goin back and sayin he was only leading on ONE card? Okay, at least you had the decency to correct your mistake.
                    When has I said anything else?

                    Comment

                    • Sledgeweather17
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jun 2015
                      • 3587
                      • 154
                      • 5
                      • 34,855

                      #70
                      Originally posted by stealthradon
                      When has I said anything else?
                      Fact is, Brook was losing by large margins (97-92, 96-93) when the fight was stopped. Just coz one scorecard (95-94) was close don't mean shieet!

                      He was on his way to a WIDE UD loss, end of story.

                      Don't matter how you try to spin it, he was losing by wide margins when the fight was stopped. Period! End of discussion.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP