I think Brook wants his eyes running on the floor now instead of broken eye sockets.
Comments Thread For: Brook Aims To Target Jermell Charlo, Jarrett Hurd, Erislandy Lara
Collapse
-
-
Kell was stopped in the eleventh round, which means the scorecards you provided are totally impossible because 10 rounds would have to be scored, which means that at the least your scores should be in the 90s and not the 80s like you have it.
Now that I've exposed your ******ity and dishonesty, let me provide a link just to cement it.
Errol Spence Jr. and Kell Brook did not disappoint in their anticipated matchup, while George Groves finally earned a title during an entertaining weekend of boxing. Get caught up on the biggest fights around the world with Dan Rafael's scorecard.
Scores were in FACT 97-92, 96-93, and 95-94, ALL IN FAVOUR OF ERROL SPENCE JNR!!!!
Here's another link from THE GUARDIAN newspaper:
Round-by-round updates: Errol Spence Jr stopped Kell Brook in the 11th round to capture the IBF welterweight title in Sheffield
Shows exactly the same scorecards as ESPN, oh and the guardian's scorecard also reads in favour of Errol Spence at 96-93.
Lol, you really thought people were dumb enough to believe those fake fanboy scorecards of yours?Last edited by Sledgeweather17; 11-28-2017, 06:58 AM.Comment
-
You know how easy it is to prove that you're lying? I don't even need to provide a link to prove it.
Kell was stopped in the eleventh round, which means the scorecards you provided are totally impossible because 10 rounds would have to be scored, which means that at the least your scores should be in the 90s and not the 80s like you have it.
Now that I've exposed your ******ity and dishonesty, let me provide a link just to cement it.
Errol Spence Jr. and Kell Brook did not disappoint in their anticipated matchup, while George Groves finally earned a title during an entertaining weekend of boxing. Get caught up on the biggest fights around the world with Dan Rafael's scorecard.
Scores were in FACT 97-92, 96-93, and 95-94, ALL IN FAVOUR OF ERROL SPENCE JNR!!!!
Here's another link from THE GUARDIAN newspaper:
Round-by-round updates: Errol Spence Jr stopped Kell Brook in the 11th round to capture the IBF welterweight title in Sheffield
Shows exactly the same scorecards as ESPN, oh and the guardian's scorecard also reads in favour of Errol Spence at 96-93.
Lol, you really thought people were dumb enough to believe those fake fanboy scorecards of yours?
Let me quote myself, because, perhaps, if I repeat it, it might go into that thick idiotic skull of yours.
"Coming in to round 10 the scores were
84-87
86-85
85-86"
Now tell me, what does that mean, you daft cúnt.
Going in to the 10th round.. Do you understand these words then?
Let me try to make it even easier for you.
Until number girl, who had the number 10. Here's a helpful guide:
That means the previous 9 rounds, ie. the rounds before the KD, as I stated in the post as well, that Brook was doing fine on the scorecards, and could have won from that point on.
Do you understand this, or are you just too dumb?Comment
-
Are you able to read, you dumb motherfúcker? Are you?
Let me quote myself, because, perhaps, if I repeat it, it might go into that thick idiotic skull of yours.
"Coming in to round 10 the scores were
84-87
86-85
85-86"
Now tell me, what does that mean, you daft cúnt.
Going in to the 10th round.. Do you understand these words then?
Let me try to make it even easier for you.
Until number girl, who had the number 10. Here's a helpful guide:
That means the previous 9 rounds, ie. the rounds before the KD, as I stated in the post as well, that Brook was doing fine on the scorecards, and could have won from that point on.
Do you understand this, or are you just too dumb?
In other words, you are STILL blatantly lying. At no point in that fight, and certainly not going into the tenth, was Brook leading on the cards, or could have won that fight.
You're full of shieeet!Comment
-
STILL!!! If the final scorecards were 97-92, 96-93, and 95-94 for Errol Spence, there is STILL no way the cards could have read what you claim they read going into the tenth.
In other words, you are STILL blatantly lying. At no point in that fight, and certainly not going into the tenth, was Brook leading on the cards, or could have won that fight.
You're full of shieeet!
If the scores were
87-84 and the round was 10-8 it would be
97-92
86-85 and the round was 10-8 it would be
96-93
85-86 and the round was 10-8 it would be
95-94
Yes, Brook was leading on one card going into the tenth. That's a fact. And trailing by one point on another.
The cards did read what I said, that's not a matter of opinion. It's not my fault you don't know about boxing nor simple addition.Comment
-
Comment
-
I never said he was winning the fight. Where did I say so?
I said, until that point he was doing quite well. Do you not acknowledge the fact that on two of the scorecards the difference until the KD was just one point? That means that without the KD, and it had been a round for Spence, and round 11 and 12 went to Brook, it would have been a draw.
What the fúck am I wrong about, you idiot?
Learn to fúcking read next time, before opening your big gob.Comment
-
Let's do some basic maths here.
If the scores were
87-84 and the round was 10-8 it would be
97-92
86-85 and the round was 10-8 it would be
96-93
85-86 and the round was 10-8 it would be
95-94
Yes, Brook was leading on one card going into the tenth. That's a fact. And trailing by one point on another.
The cards did read what I said, that's not a matter of opinion. It's not my fault you don't know about boxing nor simple addition.Comment
-
Comment
-
Fact is, Brook was losing by large margins (97-92, 96-93) when the fight was stopped. Just coz one scorecard (95-94) was close don't mean shieet!
He was on his way to a WIDE UD loss, end of story.
Don't matter how you try to spin it, he was losing by wide margins when the fight was stopped. Period! End of discussion.Comment
Comment