"Literally nothing in the article suggest he wants to make a comeback"
That is what I said. And it doesn't
Nothing in the article suggests that he is making a comeback.
Fool you did it again. Are we talking about the "source" as you said in your prior post? I guess not, because now your going back to what you said at first. Your confusing yourself on purpose.
The entire article suggest he wants a come back. But look at your last comment; "Nothing suggest that he IS making a comeback"
I agree with you on that. No one said he was INDEED coming back, and the article surely didnt. The article suggest that he wants another fight.
believe me, if floyd could fight for another 10 years and make another billion dollars he would still be fighting. he cannot.
Conor is not a bad boxer, he could outpoint many boxers the first couple of rounds. Floyd overpowered him, so I don't see your point. Floyd didn't look completely young and the first 4 rounds were really surprising. But instead of discrediting Floyd, you might wanna credit McGregor, because he was boxing beautifully the first 4.
Fool you did it again. Are we talking about the "source" as you said in your prior post? I guess not, because now your going back to what you said at first. Your confusing yourself on purpose.
The entire article suggest he wants a come back. But look at your last comment; "Nothing suggest that he IS making a comeback"
I agree with you on that. No one said he was INDEED coming back, and the article surely didnt. The article suggest that he wants another fight.
There is nothing in the article to suggest he wants to make a comeback.
A writer opening his article with a statment doesn't suggest anything.
Again, nothing in the article suggests Floyd Mayweather wants to make a comeback. Literally nothing.
Conor is not a bad boxer, he could outpoint many boxers the first couple of rounds. Floyd overpowered him, so I don't see your point. Floyd didn't look completely young and the first 4 rounds were really surprising. But instead of discrediting Floyd, you might wanna credit McGregor, because he was boxing beautifully the first 4.
connor made his freaking debut and had his chin six inches above his chest. looked like a debuting fighter for sure. and gassed like one, too.
if you think floyd was looking like anything other than a shell of what he used to be you don't know boxing.
and if you call what mcgregor did "beautiful, "or think that guy stands an iceberg's chance in hell against thurman, spence, crawford, garcia, you're nuts, dumb / naive, or a fanboy.
connor made his freaking debut and had his chin six inches above his chest. looked like a debuting fighter for sure. and gassed like one, too.
if you think floyd was looking like anything other than a shell of what he used to be you don't know boxing.
and if you call what mcgregor did "beautiful, "or think that guy stands an iceberg's chance in hell against thurman, spence, crawford, garcia, you're nuts, dumb / naive, or a fanboy.
6 inches above his chest
He's extremely lucky Floyd is old and not a puncher otherwise it would have been a very short night.
Conor is not a bad boxer, he could outpoint many boxers the first couple of rounds. Floyd overpowered him, so I don't see your point. Floyd didn't look completely young and the first 4 rounds were really surprising. But instead of discrediting Floyd, you might wanna credit McGregor, because he was boxing beautifully the first 4.
Yeah cool story bro, good luck with that one "boxing beautifully" no I'll tell you what is beautiful I forfeited my nan to a west Indian during a game of bakkarat she was the stake. I lost and off she went...beautiful
Comment