NELO Had BETTER Punches THAN GGG, How Did He "RUN?"

[Sir_Didymus]

Make a highlight reel of Lil'gs best moments against Alvarez. Take your time....let us know which super computer you usedo for editing. I used a Pentium 25mhz with 4mb of RAM using Windows 95

So now you've gone from a regular casual fanboy trolling poorly to full on ****** judging who the winner is in a boxing match on whether they can produce a good highlights reel or not. O...K.

Thanks for humiliating yourself once again, dumbass. Saved me the trouble.

[Curt Henning]

So now you've gone from a regular casual fanboy trolling poorly to full on ****** judging who the winner is in a boxing match on whether they can produce a good highlights reel or not. O...K.

Thanks for humiliating yourself once again, dumbass. Saved me the trouble.

i dont think hes judging a fight on the production of a highlight reel...i think hes challenging those who think ggg won to show him the clean, difference making, punches....its a challenge...go ahead and show him one or make one

where are the difference making punches that make you say "damn ok"...where are the nice clean shots?

[Sir_Didymus]

i dont think hes judging a fight on the production of a highlight reel...i think hes challenging those who think ggg won to show him the clean, difference making, punches....its a challenge...go ahead and show him one or make one

where are the difference making punches that make you say "damn ok"...where are the nice clean shots?

He's not. You're of the same ilk. Another casual fanboy thinking boxing is about eye catching punches. No. It's a simple sport. It's not a beauty contest. Punches that land are the only ones that matter no matter how eye catching it was otherwise the jab would be abolished and everyone would be throwing spectacular punches more than a simple jab. That's why jabs have their own category on the trolls favoured tool of CompuBox alongside power punches.

You know, the jab...the simplest punch that gave fighters like Hearns, Wright, Holmes, Liston, Ali, Mayweather, RJJ, ODLH and every other HOF'er you can name legendary status. Something Canelo doesn't have. Again, Canelos CompuBox stats proved that in a lot of his fights.

Just take his fight with Lara for example. He couldn't land the jab so when he missed the jab he'd throw power punches and he landed a huge number of power punches in that fight yet was out-jabbed. To dumbass casuals like you...you'd eat that up and say Canelo deserved to win because he made your jaws drop like the **** sucker you are and say wow.

Highlights huh? That's what YouTube is for. Go ahead. You'll see highlights showcasing why both fighters deserved the win. Why? Simple. Anyone can look like a world beater on a highlights reel.

I'll let you two biased casual fanboys bicker amongst each other thinking you know boxing talking about CompuBox even though it proves you wrong, talking about highlight reels and eye catching punches... really?? LMFAO!!! O...K.

[garfios]

Are you biased **** sucking fanboys still arguing over this ****? Canelo lost. I'm a neutral. Always have been always will be. Why? None of these boxers will put food on my table. They are nothing but Clowns here to amuse me.

If a certain anti-GGG section of the YouTube community started giving GGG the fight because they knew they'd be called out for their biased bull**** then you know GGG actually won. Personally I'll never understand why people draw lines and take sides. These boxers don't even know you exist.

You same fanboys were the ones who accused Mayweather of being a runner. Same ones who accused Lara of being a runner against Canelo. Yet Lara did to Canelo what Canelo did to GGG but in much better fashion yet he lost?? Come on. Some of you are even Mayweather fanboys salty because GGG called him out which is funny because GGG himself wouldn't fight a bigger man than himself. Still hasn't. Which is hilarious considering how idiots think he's P4P now. GGG is just a fortunate man to be in an era with not so many great 160lb fighters. There are a few at 160lb now that will make things interesting if GGG hangs around.

Cut the drama. Canelo lost. Dropping a belt prior, no matter what excuses there are i.e negotiation power, it doesn't look good for Canelo. Especially when he himself said he'll fight GGG next immediately after the fight and has no issue yet here we are discussing who he'll be fighting next.

Stay neutral kids and ask for this rematch to happen immediately, even though it won't because Oscarina is a *****, and you can get back to ragging on each other after the result of the next one if it's a definitive win.

Nice. Agreed 100%. Nothing is going to change of course. fanboys will be fanboys...

[Lester Tutor]

He's not. You're of the same ilk. Another casual fanboy thinking boxing is about eye catching punches. No. It's a simple sport. It's not a beauty contest. Punches that land are the only ones that matter no matter how eye catching it was otherwise the jab would be abolished and everyone would be throwing spectacular punches more than a simple jab. That's why jabs have their own category on the trolls favoured tool of CompuBox alongside power punches.

You know, the jab...the simplest punch that gave fighters like Hearns, Wright, Holmes, Liston, Ali, Mayweather, RJJ, ODLH and every other HOF'er you can name legendary status. Something Canelo doesn't have. Again, Canelos CompuBox stats proved that in a lot of his fights.

Just take his fight with Lara for example. He couldn't land the jab so when he missed the jab he'd throw power punches and he landed a huge number of power punches in that fight yet was out-jabbed. To dumbass casuals like you...you'd eat that up and say Canelo deserved to win because he made your jaws drop like the **** sucker you are and say wow.

Highlights huh? That's what YouTube is for. Go ahead. You'll see highlights showcasing why both fighters deserved the win. Why? Simple. Anyone can look like a world beater on a highlights reel.

I'll let you two biased casual fanboys bicker amongst each other thinking you know boxing talking about CompuBox even though it proves you wrong, talking about highlight reels and eye catching punches... really?? LMFAO!!! O...K.

Maybe I should do a worst performance video reel of Lil’G and upload it. You know, the one he has with Alvarez

[turnedup]

Since when did hard punches on the arms not count as physical damage? Most of Spence''s hard grind work is to break a guy down by smashing guards... of course the hurt is nothing like petruing internal organs, but to a casual viewer smashing arms when guards are up hurts! Therefore to the casual compubox such strikes are landed, doesn't matter if the logic of the sweet science tells you it's not effective..

Besides, sweet science compubox or casual compubox wont help that GGG had his worst performance to date.

Nelo landed the more memorable and elegant shots. Effective aggression means, for a master who closes the ring, to capitalize and score when yoube got the other trapped...

Nelo''s effective performance supersedes the theory that he was running by his more effective compubox alone.

Again...you are selling semantics. Outright how do you score a fight...I mean can we as a community come to an agreement on what is a scoring blow? Because quite honestly a "glancing blow" per round shouldn't equate a win of a round. Any fool can land one sweet shot a round so should that overcome being hit with 50 jabs? No. So again, can we "together" say this scores and that does not? Because i'm tired of the self serving switches in how people score fights. I have seen one guy say the jab won the fight for this fighter and then the jab suddenly doesn't win a fight in another match..so which one is it?