Floyd Mayweather Jr.'s resume is outstanding.

[john l]

haha floyd and great resume lmao

Idiot Hey whatever happened to BS beating Wilder??How did that fight go???

[DeadLikeMe]

Floyd's resume is going to age so ridiculously well. There is nothing the haters can do about it either.

[john l]

Floyd's resume is going to age so ridiculously well. There is nothing the haters can do about it either.

yup......................and it really hurts them

[john l]

Floyd's resume is going to age so ridiculously well. There is nothing the haters can do about it either.

Hey you kinda close I'm in MN. We gonna beat your packers again lol.No really though that sucks you guys lost Rodgers I know it ****** for us to lose Cook.But Rodgers is top 3 QB EASY wish we had him.

[chrisJS]

Mosley had only lost to Cotto in 6 years had just ko'd Margarito and was p4p #3 and Wba champ and lineal CHAMP yet you discredit that win for Floyd

Since you felt fit to make make this statement but chose to not answer I'll post it again. Again, why is Marquez W12 Barrera not a good win but Mayweather W12 Mosley is a great win? I don't want to get into you claims that Marquez KO6 Pacquaio is not a great win but Mosley W12 Mosley is because well, that is beyond re__tarded.

Between his second dominant loss to Wright and the Mayweather fight (which he was 16 months inactive for also) there had been 5 years and 5 months time elapsed which is not 6. Also 7 is a larger number than 6 according to facts and basic math. So obviously 7 is a larger number than 5 1/2 would you agree? This is the 2nd time a Floyd nuttrider has shown a lack of math and dates. One tried to convince me and a few others than 1984 happened before 1983 a few weeks back and that was regarding Duran-Hager-Hearns in an emotional defense of a fighter he's probably never paid to see live. The fanboys are a weird bunch.

Cotto is not as good as Pacquaio also. Not even close.

Margarito is not as good as Morales. Not even close. In fact Margarito (without wraps) is not as good as Juarez, Tapia, Peden, Ayala also if we are basing his career on the non wraps part. But regardless Morales is better than ANY Margarito.

So why do you act like the Mosley win is so great but talk down the Barrera win?
I broke the math down for you. it is a great win. Why do you consider the Mosley win great and not the Barrera when factoring the following?

7 years and 1 month is longer than 5 years and 5 months (you used this as a point why the Mosley win is great and the Barrera one not despite the math rendering your claim useless)

Pacquaio is better than Cotto (they have a fight at a catchweight and a career to prove this)

Morales is better than Margarito and a great fighter (don't need to explain this or do I?...)

Also as a few bonus points. a 16 month layoff is a bigger and more effective layoff than a 6 month layoff and 38 is an older age than 33.

Another is that you said "Barrera did nothing after the fight" but Mosley did? Really? Mosley went 3-4-1 including an embarrassing quit job against Bumdine. Barrera went 4-2 including a points loss to Pacquaio (a great in his prime) and a screw job TD against Khan.

So your claims about 5 1/2 years being an equal or longer period of time than 7 years

Cotto being equal to or greater than Pacquaio (when Cotto isn't even great)

Barrera did nothing after the fight but Mosley did

Are all false.

In addition to 38 being older than 33 and 16 months inactive is more inactive than 6 months

[The Big Dunn]

Floyd's resume is going to age so ridiculously well. There is nothing the haters can do about it either.

I think this is the reason you see so many disgruntled Manny fans and the usual Floyd haters constantly bringing the subject up.

[djtmal]

I'm a big fan of both. SRL came along in a better era so got to fight greater fighters than Floyd but ended up with a lot less fights due to his retirements. Floyd meanwhile didn't have a Hearns or Hagler type challenge (You could say Pacquiao I guess) but dominated 5 different weight classes and dominated lots of very good and great fighters over almost 20 years. Besides that both guys are actually pretty similar. Ray was a womanizer, so was Floyd. The only difference is that SRL picked the clean good guy image while Money Mayweather chose to play the villain.

Who's the greater fighter? Both are legendary but I gotta go with Floyd. More skilled and more intelligent in the ring. It would've been a tough fight because Ray was bigger but across the board Floyd is more skilled/smart/complete and had an unbelievably great IQ in the ring. He never would've fought Duran ******ly like Ray did in that first fight, and also gave immediate rematches to the guys who gave him close fights. Got a lot of love for Ray but the fact that he beat Hagler so controversially then retired to avoid the rematch then came back as soon as Hagler retired, to me that's a black mark on his legacy and I view Hagler as the greatest fighter of that era even though their fight was super-close and very debatable.

I respect your opinion even though it differs from mine

[djtmal]

I think this is the reason you see so many disgruntled Manny fans and the usual Floyd haters constantly bringing the subject up.

i just like to know how is this resume with no atg's in their prime to speak of, is gonna look any different 20 years from now...

[hugh grant]

Floyd's resume is going to age so ridiculously well. There is nothing the haters can do about it either.

This is what you wish and hope four in a utopia workd. That's why threads like this is made up by Floyd fans. Floyd fans who keep questioning why haters keep talking about him?
But reality is Floyd is too much of a figure of fun. Too much ammunition Floyd has given people that it takes away from resume.
So reality it won't age well.

[djtmal]

had just ko'd Margarito

he hadn't juuust ko'd margarito...thats the bs right there