Comments Thread For: Froch: No Issue if Jacobs Would've Got Decision in Golovkin Bout
Collapse
-
i really dont GAF about derek chisora or billy joe saunders...or adam smith...or wankers...i reallky dont GAF what froch thought of the jacobos golovkin fight eitherFroch won on the scorecards, then complained about people who saw it the way you did.Now he sees it the way the UK media spin it. I don't talk about drinking Jizz because I'm not gay, but I am mixed race, live in the UK, and find the media patronising. Froch has a right to he's opinions, but he's a hypocrite for sure. Listen to Adam Smith talk about how lovely a man Chisora is, how much personality Billy Joe Saunders has, when both are clearly Wankkers. It's only because they are considered **********, and therefore to be pandered to.
its clear though you feel the need to comment on froch because you love golovkin so much and froch basically dissed your crush in your opinionComment
-
If Jacobs got the decision, it would have been as bad as the decision Froch got v Dirrell...
Dirrell literally beat Froch in every department. Even when they went toe to toe in exchanges, he was whooping Froch at his own game and then outboxed him when he felt like it. Dirrell was annoyingly flopping to the floor a lot of the time but he still won that fight.Comment
-
Yep, it would've been a perfectly acceptable resultComment
-
White supremacists are so starved for white talent to root for a Kazakhstani citizen named Gennady Golovkin is now considered white. GGG is Asian btw dumbass. He's one of those ********** you're whining about Europeans sticking up for.No issue? Is Froch an idiot? GGG scored a knockdown - so for Jacobs to win - he would have to win at least 7 rounds. How could anybody legitimately find 7 rounds to give to Jacobs?
Europeans are always looking to suck up to ********** - they are such a Mangina Cuck continent now.Comment
-
Comment
-
Your really are repressing your sexaulity, talking about Jizz and man crushes.I comment because I feel like it, and the comment of mine that you replied to was on the subject of the PC Sky media team and Froch being a hypocrite. The fact that you felt the need to comment shows how jealous you are of a certain fighter. This is a fact, because you just admitted that you don't gaf about what Froch thought of the Jacobs Golovkin verdict and yet that's the subject of the article that you are looking at the comments on. So you just exposed yourself as someone who looks for anyone who mentions Golovkin in any way that's not derogatory and feels a need to reply to their comment with some strange ****sexual taint that I guess you picked up in childhood. Is this just your way of talking to men since you don't seem to "gaf" about boxing?i really dont GAF about derek chisora or billy joe saunders...or adam smith...or wankers...i reallky dont GAF what froch thought of the jacobos golovkin fight either
its clear though you feel the need to comment on froch because you love golovkin so much and froch basically dissed your crush in your opinionComment
-

Comment