Would the Wilder-Joshua winner be a to 10 atg heavy?

[Earl-Hickey]

Whichever wins itd be one of the vest wins vs a prime heavyweight ever

[Deus]

Whichever wins itd be one of the vest wins vs a prime heavyweight ever

No. No for either of them and especially no for Wilder.

You cannot be an ATG with 1 notable win on your record (or 2 if Joshua wins). Either one of them would need to go on and dominate in the manner that Klitschko did to make that distinction.

[Earl-Hickey]

No. No for either of them and especially no for Wilder.

You cannot be an ATG with 1 notable win on your record (or 2 if Joshua wins). Either one of them would need to go on and dominate in the manner that Klitschko did to make that distinction.

But if joshua beat wilder he would have 2 wins better than any of klitschkos wins.

What difference does a bunch of bums make?

[Rip Chudd]

no freaking way

[Deus]

But if joshua beat wilder he would have 2 wins better than any of klitschkos wins.

What difference does a bunch of bums make?

Longevity is the difference. Yes Klitschko didn't have that many standout fighters on his record but he held his titles for 9 years... that is an achievement, especially in the heavyweight division where upsets can happen.

[STEELHEAD]

ATG ??? thats insulting!

[Ray*]

No ******** way. They not even top 25 but the weird thing is one of them can end up holding all 4 belts by 2019.

[Ray*]

no freaking way

Sorry my thought exactly lol.

[Godsfly]

nooooooo. and i like both. joshua would need to beat fury. wilder. parker. he has wlad. and thats a ATG heavy top 10 resume.

wilder would need to beat joshua, fury, parker, someone like a ortiz without the riods. thats A ATG 10 resume. look the heavy division is full of talent. guys that can make them great. no need for this, no need for jumping the gun.......the fighters are there for ether man to be great.

[daggum]

Longevity is the difference. Yes Klitschko didn't have that many standout fighters on his record but he held his titles for 9 years... that is an achievement, especially in the heavyweight division where upsets can happen.

clinching is the difference. he held his title because he developed a style in which he held onto his opponnt for dear life anytime he felt threatened and the corrupt sport known as boxng let him because he sold the tickets. we know what was happening to him....ko'd 3 times when he stepped up before he developed his cheat tactics. no one should actually think wlad was a great boxer.