Wilder's jab is great

[LetOutTheCage]

Who said he did?

you did right here:

The same agenda of the majority of the posters here. To underplay Wilder's resume and overplay Joshua's.

[N/A]

you did right here:

Apparently you don't understand how words work.

You asked us what we thought his agenda was, so we told you.

You didn't ask us what he said.

You took the answer from the question you asked and then lied and claimed it was the answer to a question you didn't ask.

Do you have any purpose here other than wasting time?

[daggum]

The same agenda of the majority of the posters here. To underplay Wilder's resume and overplay Joshua's.

you have an agenda. you are using the transnational rankings in order to confirm your bias because they removed wlad out of inactivity. if you used the ring rankings you would see klitschko was ranked #1. i already showed you this but you ignored because you have an agenda.

also explained to you that stirverne was severely overranked. he was unranked and then he beat the #9 fighter and was moved to #2. in the same period glazkov beat the #3 fighter and was only moved up to #7. doesnt make a whole lot of sense to me.

wilders resume sucks. hes beaten 1 top 10 guy, joshua has beaten 4(2 were in the top 10 and 2 are in the top 10 now) joshua has 4 ko's of the top 10 guys he fought. wilder 0 ko's. remember when people used to say its easy to ko bums...power punchers are overrated...lets see how he does when he steps up....oh those were the ggg days. joshua and wilder both have crap resumes. if you want a good resume go see ggg who has fought the top 3 in his division. oh how times have changed.

[LetOutTheCage]

Apparently you don't understand how words work.

You asked us what we thought his agenda was, so we told you.

You didn't ask us what he said.

You took the answer from the question you asked and then lied and claimed it was the answer to a question you didn't ask.

Do you have any purpose here other than wasting time?

Apparently you have a limited capacity to remember things...Do you have any purpose here other than trolling?

Because he called his resume "****."

So who really has the agenda when you're trashing the resume of the only heavyweight champion that's actually fought a top ranked fighter?!?

[soul_survivor]

So great i made this thread about it, bros. Nice power and snap. It's just lovely....

No it's not. It's actually a joke of a jab when you get out jabbed by a chubby eastern euro who is some 4 inches shorter than you.

[Sheldon312]

AJ's highest ranked win is #6.

Wilder's highest ranked win is #3.


Wilder's resume is nothing special, but he did agree to face #1 and #2 fighters who both got caught cheating multiple times. So when you lose out on the opportunity to add those scalps to your resume, your resume isn't going to be the greatest.


AJ has been very impressive, but his resume isn't very impressive (nor should it be, he's still young).

But when you over praise AJ's resume and under praise Wilder's, which is the norm on this site, it should be pointed out that AJ still doesn't have a top 5 win.

Wilder does.

The pot calling the kettle black is never a good look.

We still don't know how any of those fights would've went. Povetkin and Ortiz are levels above Stiverne

[N/A]

you have an agenda. you are using the transnational rankings in order to confirm your bias because they removed wlad out of inactivity. if you used the ring rankings you would see klitschko was ranked #1. i already showed you this but you ignored because you have an agenda.

We use TBRB because it's the only logical independent rankings to use. Ring isn't independent anymore. It's owned by HBO's lead promoter. It's an in house propaganda publication. Nothing more. The more you insist on using Ring, the more obvious it becomes how easily you are fooled.

Every credible journalist quit Ring to start TBRB because Ring's new owners started interfering with the rankings.

Every credible independent ranking system would remove a fighter after 18 months off. But since it benefited HBO to keep Klitschko in the rankings, Ring did it. Just as they now keep Fury as champion to prevent Showtime from crowning the new champion. Even though Fury retired (which under Ring rules means you vacated). Even though Fury hasn't fought in 18 months (which under Ring rules means you vacated). Even though Fury hasn't fought a top contender in two years (which under Ring rules means you vacated).

If we can clearly see that Ring is corrupt, not credible, and we know for a fact that it's owned by HBO's lead promoter, and all of the most respected journalists have gone public that the rankings have been corrupted, forcing them to quit in disgust, why would you use Ring rankings unless you yourself have no credibility?

[Real King Kong]

It was VERY good against Stiverne , great is pushing it bc thats ONE fight .

exactly. jabs usually look great against smaller opponents. it didn't look so great when he was getting out jabbed by Washington in the early going.

[BoxingFan85]

he has a good stiff jab.. straight, quick & impactful.. He also leans in on it so he gets more range..
But his right drops a little when he does that & guys who can counter like AJ did against martin can duck/dodge & come back with their counter right..
It would have been good if Stiverne tried to jab him like Washington did & then we could have seen how Wilder would have jabbed then..

[GhostofDempsey]

Good jab against a flabby POS. But he carries his left too low and brings the jab up from his waist. That may work against the Stiverne's of the world, I don't see him having much success with that against someone who comes to fight.