More impressive performance?: AJ-Takam or Wilder-Stiverne

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Elroy The Great
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Aug 2016
    • 15935
    • 371
    • 249
    • 45,972

    #71
    wilder didnt get hit

    Comment

    • RussB23
      Loma Crew
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2015
      • 4329
      • 154
      • 66
      • 12,195

      #72
      Originally posted by larryxxx.
      so why did you dedicate your entire profile to hype him?
      Just as a parody. I really dont care about stiverne at all.

      Comment

      • JayID
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Jan 2017
        • 132
        • 7
        • 0
        • 13,002

        #73
        Originally posted by yammy25
        Being reluctant to lie down...but also only winning 1 round on the scorecards means his performance was better than his opponents??

        Having guts.. doesnt make a performance. Why dont you just say not dieing is now a factor in performance rankings?
        In terms of fighters performing to their maximum potential. Yes he gave the best performance in those fights. Joshua was lackluster compared to what he could have been. Wilder was fighting a bin who by compubox numbers didn't land a single punch. So yes.. I think that Takam gave the best performance out of those fights.

        Comment

        • Grimgash
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2005
          • 2625
          • 108
          • 32
          • 15,477

          #74
          Better win? AJ... but Wilder had the far more impressive performance.

          Comment

          • TOBYLEE1
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 6824
            • 181
            • 49
            • 14,831

            #75
            I say the same. AJ had a more live opponent that moved well and Wilder did what he had to do with the type of opponent in front of him.

            Now lets see how we get these two guys in the ring

            Comment

            • Tom Cruise
              Co.cktail
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 11442
              • 539
              • 474
              • 39,887

              #76
              Originally posted by Ray*
              Why would an early KO win not be more impressive?
              Because Stiverne looked like a big old bowl of Jelly?

              Takam is a legit name on Joshuas resume. Stiverne is a bum at this point. Maybe he always was a bum, but he definitely is one now.

              Ill take a tough but comfortable win over a tough live opponent over a 1 round ko over a pudding like Stiverne

              Comment

              • Ray*
                Be safe!!!
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2005
                • 44867
                • 1,654
                • 1,608
                • 558,890

                #77
                Originally posted by Tom Cruise
                Because Stiverne looked like a big old bowl of Jelly?

                Takam is a legit name on Joshuas resume. Stiverne is a bum at this point. Maybe he always was a bum, but he definitely is one now.

                Ill take a tough but comfortable win over a tough live opponent over a 1 round ko over a pudding like Stiverne
                Of course Takam is the tougher fighter at this point, no one should argue that. Having said that a KO is a KO and the way Wilder KO him was more impressive. Takam is a fighter that no one looks great fighting. Same happened with Joseph Parker when he fought Takam, the only fighter to look good against Takam was a guy that was on some drugs (Pedvtkin).

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP