Comments Thread For: Whyte Livid With WBC - Breazeale-Molina Winner in Line For Wilder

[juggernaut666]

Aside from Stiverne, Wilder's opponents have been fighting for peanuts - 100-250k, and that's for title defenses.. Washington got the best deal (250k) because he's a Haymon fighter. Breazeale reportedly got close to a million for the Joshua fight. I would not be surprised if Hearn's offer to fight Whyte was around 500k ("substantial" according to Hearn), which would be more than what he would probably net from both the Molina and (potentially) Wilder fights. I would guess he's fighting Molina for around 200k. Plus, if he beat Whyte he would have still gotten the Wilder fight. I think besides having too high expectations (after the Wildrer 4 million offer) Breazeale was just stopped by Haymon so they can set up the circus with Molina.

your missing the big picture. no amount of money he got from Hearn would have been close to the wilder fight. No guarantee either he beats whyte who lets be real would be favored over him right now so why risk it.

[Jewish-Reptile]

Whyte has a better resume than Wilder. Chisora is better than Stiverne.

Whyte has a better résumé than Wilder ? Brake that down for me, please.

Under what pretext is Chisora better than Stiverne. Chisora was absolutely bullied by Pulev, chewed up and shat out by FISTS OF FLUFF Furry, beaten up by a one armed Vitali, eviscerated by Haye, what the hell has Chisora ever done ? He went life and death with the guy you're trying to justify has a better résumé than Wilder, nothing you say has any merit , it carries no weight, holds no water.

Your posts are utter whack.

[donjigga11]

Apparently it's not a wbc eliminator. Whyte said on his twitter Hearn got in contact with Sulaiman and he confirmed it wasn't.

[jase45]

Whyte took DMAA, the same substance as Stiverne took last year, Whyte got a 2 year ban Stiverne just got a just a $70,000 fine and no ban, Miller also got a small ban and a fine for taking DMAA, I guess it depends on how much money you have if you want to avoid a ban.

[Clubber Pac]

Whyte needs to STFU.

Blame your promoter dummy, he was the one that low balled Breazeale when he was looking for a fight a month ago.

If Eddie Hearn pays up, Whyte is in line for fight for a mandatory spot.

For once, the WBC did nothing wrong, Whyte has done ZERO warrant mandatory status.

Get in line chump

[Travycat]

Completely agree.

Dillian would batter Molina and Breazale ,no problem !!!

[trouser python]

The primary reason Bermane Stiverne was willing to step aside and allow the Deontay Wilder-Luis Ortiz fight to be made was because he was certain it wouldn’t happen.


If your position was correct, that Stiverne was stepping aside period, and not just stepping aside for Ortiz, then Stiverne's public comments wouldn't make any sense, the WBC's actions wouldn't make any sense, and this fight wouldn't be happening at all.




Didn't matter what they were considering, Stiverne wouldn't allow it, nor would the WBC, which issued a ruling plainly stating that Ortiz was being removed and that Wilder must fight Stiverne.




OMG. You are so ****ing ******. This is a giant waste of time. Good luck getting anybody to waste the time debunking you point by point when everything you post is wrong.

But just as a going away present, here is the WBC ruling:



The WBC has concluded the process, according to its Clean Boxing Program protocol, in the adverse finding of Luis Ortiz. An official ruling has been sent to the corresponding parties.

The WBC has withdrawn its sanction of the Deontay Wilder vs. Ortiz fight, and Wilder will fight next his mandatory fight against Bermane Stiverne.

Remember this thread? I think you were calling people ****** in it?

Just out of interest who ended up being correct on this matter, or more particularly who ended up being wrong?

I think I heard somewhere, perhaps from the WBC president, that this wasn't a final eliminator after all and Brezeale is not the mandatory. Am I right? lol

[trouser python]

My position is based on numerous articles according to which after Ortiz failed his drug test Wilder's handlers were looking for replacements. And there were talks of Stiverne stepping aside way before Ortiz was in the picture, Wilder supposedly never intended to fight Stiverne again, that's at least what he had been saying for months anyway. Would Wilder's handlers be looking for replacements and would the Wilder - Stiverne II announcement come almost a week after Ortiz results came out if Wilder was contractually obligated to fight Stiverne? I don't think so.




You are right this is a waste of time as you can't debunk anything. You pretend to have inside information about Stiverne's step-aside agreement, about Breazeale - Molina fight agreement including Breazeale's purse, as well as Hearn's offer to Breazeale. The reality is you don't know anything more than what's publicly available, and that's not much. But keep pretending you know things you don't, it only weakens your arguments and lowers your credibility.

From what I know, I'm willing to bet Breazeale is fighting Molina for much less than what he was offered to fight Whyte and I'm sure the numbers will come out sooner or later, proving that Breazeale ducked Whyte just as Wilder did. And as I said, a Breazeale - Whyte fight would have been a proper way to determine the mandatory as opposed to the farce we have now.

Hey Champ just thought I would let you know if you haven't heard already, that this was not a final eliminator and the WBC Prez said Brezeale is not mandatory.

[N/A]

Remember this thread? I think you were calling people ****** in it?

The people who said Wilder could have still fought Ortiz if he wanted to? Those people? Yes, they are idiots.

Just out of interest who ended up being correct on this matter, or more particularly who ended up being wrong?

Since apparently you don't know how to read and aren't even sure which thread you are in, this should be interesting.

I think I heard somewhere, perhaps from the WBC president, that this wasn't a final eliminator after all and Brezeale is not the mandatory. Am I right? lol

And? The WBC said it was a final eliminator, Hearn complained, and they changed their mind. What does that have to do with whether it was the WBC's choice or Wilder's choice on whether Ortiz could fight?

[N/A]

Hey Champ just thought I would let you know if you haven't heard already, that this was not a final eliminator and the WBC Prez said Brezeale is not mandatory.

Were you in a coma? This was discussed nearly a week ago when Rafael posted it.