Comments Thread For: Porter on Danny Garcia: This Dude is Full of ****!

[jas]

probably, porter is a rough fight for anyone but danny beats him imo

better timing

[turnedup]

Danny beat the best guys at 140. Porter has not done that at 147.

That ain't saying much, he beat two men means he beat the best now...Porter has been in with better overall opposition. Garcia has 30 fights well under his belt and two notable wins...2...Porter beating Broner imo trumps beating anyone on Garcia's resume. Broner imo beats both Khan and Matthysse too, as does Porter but....that's just my opinion.

[PeasantCrusha]

Porter is going to keep playing his best Arron Pryor imitation until Garcia snuffs him with that surprise hook to the temple.

[WesternChamp]

agreed with porter... danny only wants easy fights.

[daggum]

Danny beat the best guys at 140. Porter has not done that at 147.

cause 147 is much better. khan was an overrated glass chinned fighter and the matthysse win was good but controversial. constant low blows and a rabbit punch knockdown that flipped the fight from a matthysse win to a garcia win. who was ref....thats right mr. establishment tony weeks. postol ko'd matthysse and no one cared. some even said crawford hasnt beaten anyone while garcia has the great resume hmmm

[Chrismart]

Garcia has gone off the radar.

[-DSG-]

That ain't saying much, he beat two men means he beat the best now...Porter has been in with better overall opposition. Garcia has 30 fights well under his belt and two notable wins...2...Porter beating Broner imo trumps beating anyone on Garcia's resume. Broner imo beats both Khan and Matthysse too, as does Porter but....that's just my opinion.

Khan and Matthysee were the top dogs and Danny was supposed to lose to both and won. Porter has stepped up twice at 147 and lost both times to Brook and Thurman.

[turnedup]

Khan and Matthysee were the top dogs and Danny was supposed to lose to both and won. Porter has stepped up twice at 147 and lost both times to Brook and Thurman.

"He was supposed to lose to both"

By who's estimation? I hate this f'ing narrative..he was supposed to lose...again thats all opinion. It's just as bad as when folks come on here saying "such and such fighting equals a guaranteed win." If predictions where that easy everyone would win the lotto by now. He was supposed to lose to Khan a guy who got put to sleep in the first round by a guy who went on to achieve absolutely nothing in his career. Matthysse had one notable win on his entire resume...ONE. Let's not act like these guys had beaten the cream of the crop of their generation because neither has. For the record since we are giving opinions as facts...Brook beats Garcia because Brook hits just as hard and actually has a chin. Hell Lamont Peterson also arguably beat Garcia while we are at it.

[SkillspayBills]

Danny Garcia is quickly creeping up my most hated fighters list. Has he mentioned Errol Spence in over a year?

[-DSG-]

"He was supposed to lose to both"

By who's estimation? I hate this f'ing narrative..he was supposed to lose...again thats all opinion. It's just as bad as when folks come on here saying "such and such fighting equals a guaranteed win." If predictions where that easy everyone would win the lotto by now. He was supposed to lose to Khan a guy who got put to sleep in the first round by a guy who went on to achieve absolutely nothing in his career. Matthysse had one notable win on his entire resume...ONE. Let's not act like these guys had beaten the cream of the crop of their generation because neither has. For the record since we are giving opinions as facts...Brook beats Garcia because Brook hits just as hard and actually has a chin. Hell Lamont Peterson also arguably beat Garcia while we are at it.

He was the clear underdog against both.