Comments Thread For: Parker Laughs: Anthony Joshua is Average - I'd Knock Him Out!

[Jkp]

So AJ looked ‘terrible’ whilst approximately 7-2 +1KD ahead against a fighter that - in my opinion at least - beat Parker? I know it’s just business, but that boy a dumbass.

Parker gonna beat that hype job. Aj was struggling with a nearly blind takam who is 6 inches shorter than him.

[Jkp]

Parker only had to wait and he was next in line for AJ. He took Ruiz instead. Parkers fought no one and looked average doing it. AJ may have laboured with Takam, but he won every round. Parker had life and death with him,Ruiz and Fury. He's a level below.

Wait how long? Until after wlad fight and after dealing with all his other mandatories ? Yeah right...

[E10Rifle]

Parker gonna beat that hype job. Aj was struggling with a nearly blind takam who is 6 inches shorter than him.

Yeah, it was a struggle. You know why? Because Takam is a decent operator at world level. Pretty quick, solid skills and extremely tough. You know how I know that? Because he beat Parker.

[Jkp]

Yeah, it was a struggle. You know why? Because Takam is a decent operator at world level. Pretty quick, solid skills and extremely tough. You know how I know that? Because he beat Parker.

Ha ha... ok. I guess your more qualified than the 3 judges ?

[Slowhand]

So many threads full of shyte comments. First of all: Takam has always been a tough SOB, he went to war with Povetkin for 10 rds and gave Parker a hard 12 rds. Takam was also the back up for Pulev all along so he was in shape. Not Joshua´s greatest performance but he sure wasn´t fighting a bum.
Whyte knew he was fighting on the card - just not the opponent - so he was in shape, Helenius on the other hand was not. Robert´s own fault of course, but let´s not pretend Whyte made some big statement.

[E10Rifle]

Ha ha... ok. I guess your more qualified than the 3 judges ?

Yeah, the “have you ever been a professional boxing judge? No, so shut up” line of argument. Classic. And spurious.

I suppose you’ve never disagreed with a decision in a boxing match because the judges are infallible, right? GGG didn’t get robbed against Canelo, no? Ward won the first Kovalev fight, yes? Jamie McDonnell didn’t benefit from one of the worst decisions in history against Solis, the judges got that one right?

Fact is, Parker-Takam was a thin decision in a pick ‘em fight. Last night, tricky as he found it, the question for scorecards was: did you have AJ 5 or 7 rounds up (plus the KD)?

[Jkp]

So many threads full of shyte comments. First of all: Takam has always been a tough SOB, he went to war with Povetkin for 10 rds and gave Parker a hard 12 rds. Takam was also the back up for Pulev all along so he was in shape. Not Joshua´s greatest performance but he sure wasn´t fighting a bum.
Whyte knew he was fighting on the card - just not the opponent - so he was in shape, Helenius on the other hand was not. Robert´s own fault of course, but let´s not pretend Whyte made some big statement.

Whyte was awful. Wobbled with a jab in the 2nd. ... lol

[Ham Porter]

Well considering Takam took the fight on short notice, the amount of trouble he gave AJ gives JP a pinch more credibility but if he couldn't figure out Hughie Fury.

Takam gave Joshua about as much trouble as Breazeale did.

[Slowhand]

Whyte was awful. Wobbled with a jab in the 2nd. ... lol

I always thought Whyte was overrated but he was ready for 12 rds and Helenius came in as a 4 rder. Price vs Helenius, 6 rds..?

[Tobi.G]

I always thought Whyte was overrated but he was ready for 12 rds and Helenius came in as a 4 rder. Price vs Helenius, 6 rds..?

I thought Helenius could knock Whyte out because at the weigh inn he looked good for his standarts and Whyte looked fat. But Helnius has the mentality of a yourneyman and he calls himself a Wiking.....LMFAO!!!!