Mike McCallum

[john l]

same here bro, I don't know how half this stuff works yet 😂

I guess if you give somone karma they get a green dot.just opened new thread asking about some of this stuff.rep power ect

[john l]

I had 1 last nite I think and now have like 10 it must be a mistake lol

[TOBYLEE1]

I don't think hearns would have said that but I know manny who was training both at one point did not wanna see then fight.but I think hit man beats him if used his boxing skills and also could khtfo if he caught him with big right.MMC had a very good chin but not like all time great. he was hurt by jack[no shame there]and curry,toney

Hearns said it while he was laughing. But you are right, Manny wouldn't had let those two guys face each other

[buddyr]

Great fighter but would lose to the modern day Middleweights.

You think Danny Jacobs, Lemieux, Curtis Stevens, Wade, GGG, and Canelo would beat Mccallum. You forget he had a very good chin as well. Even at the age of 40 well past his prime, Roy couldnt knock him out. (I don't believe that bs about Roy carrying him though he dominated the fight). Took Jackson's best and stopped him(PRIME JACKSON!!).

[Ray*]

Never saw him fight once lol, only read about him and then I try to go back on YouTube to watch his fights. Ashamed to say that because I watched most boxers from when I was like 7 years old until now.

[JK1700]

yea kalambay is underated[s hite I don't think prob half of these posters even know him.but he was very good boxer slick,good feet. the nunn loss was kinda fluke like a lot of 1st rd kos between 2 top fighters

Yeah both guys were really skilled technicians. McCallum was better, but both really good. It was surprising to me how Kalambay beat him quite convincingly first time out but he made it right in the rematch which was really a great fight to watch. I feel the same way about the Nunn fight. Since he still had good wins after that loss.

[john l]

Yeah both guys were really skilled technicians. McCallum was better, but both really good. It was surprising to me how Kalambay beat him quite convincingly first time out but he made it right in the rematch which was really a great fight to watch. I feel the same way about the Nunn fight. Since he still had good wins after that loss.

yea I also thought kal vs Mcm 2 was good fighter def closer then first I think.who did he beat after nunn loss cant really rem him getting good wins after that?was thinkin he kinda fell off. but I just might have forgot

[john l]

you are also right McM was the better fighter.but kal seemed all wrong for him.i think its been kinda shown that he could be outboxed though. if their were high rate operaters

[JK1700]

yea I also thought kal vs Mcm 2 was good fighter def closer then first I think.who did he beat after nunn loss cant really rem him getting good wins after that?was thinkin he kinda fell off. but I just might have forgot

He beat Herol Graham in the rematch (maybe the most talented fighter to never be world champ) and also Steve Collins who went on to take Eubanks 0 just a couple years later.

[john l]

He beat Herol Graham in the rematch (maybe the most talented fighter to never be world champ) and also Steve Collins who went on to take Eubanks 0 just a couple years later.

yea I kinda remember the graham fight now.forgot about the Collins fight.your right he did have some good wins after