Comments Thread For: DeGale: Can't Moan Over Canelo-GGG Draw, It Was Close Fight

[bluepete]

YOU said this.....





well, none of that happened

Golovkin did not " well beat " Canelo..... and you made a TON of lame excuses, including age..... despite specifically promising not to

just saying

words..... you cannot take them back, you can only lie

you guys couldn't keep it real if your ass was on fire

I didn't say anything about not saying that a guys handspeed and overall athletic gifts wouldn't slow by their mid 30s.I said I thought Golovkin would win, and like many I felt he did. Not that I don't think a younger version may have performed better. You've got a personal thing against him, I get it, and you naturally disagree with anyone who felt he won because you don't like him. That's why when anyone mentions age you cast it aside like it's not significant for a fighter. It is, I've boxed and done MMA, and I'm now 40.I know it has obvious effects. Dont blame me, I didn't invent aging. It's not my fault that Canelo wasn't good enough to win, and that hes conditioning was disappointing. It's just how it played out. I don't lose sleep over it being scored a draw, I felt Golovkin won, it went fairly much how I thought although Canelo showed a better chin than I thought he had, and he didn't engage as I expected. So what? Are you chasing up all the posters who said Canelo destroys Golovkin? Or are you a little bit biased? I keep it real I just say it as I see it and don't hate on men in a violent sport I've actually done. I respect good champions, see I know it's harder than it looks sitting at home on the sofa. I don't expect every fight to be a shutout, first round knockout or not to get touched and if they do I know it doesn't make them **** or a hype job. I know these guys are human beings and it's not a Steven Seagal film you know what I mean?

[aboutfkntime]

I didn't say anything about not saying that a guys handspeed and overall athletic gifts wouldn't slow by their mid 30s.I said I thought Golovkin would win, and like many I felt he did. Not that I don't think a younger version may have performed better. You've got a personal thing against him, I get it, and you naturally disagree with anyone who felt he won because you don't like him. That's why when anyone mentions age you cast it aside like it's not significant for a fighter. It is, I've boxed and done MMA, and I'm now 40.I know it has obvious effects. Dont blame me, I didn't invent aging. It's not my fault that Canelo wasn't good enough to win, and that hes conditioning was disappointing. It's just how it played out. I don't lose sleep over it being scored a draw, I felt Golovkin won, it went fairly much how I thought although Canelo showed a better chin than I thought he had, and he didn't engage as I expected. So what? Are you chasing up all the posters who said Canelo destroys Golovkin? Or are you a little bit biased?

you said this.....

Golovkin well beats Canelo, at any age. No excuses

but, FACT:..... NONE of that happened

Golovkin did not " well beat " Canelo..... and you made a TON of lame excuses, INCLUDING AGE..... despite specifically promising not to

now you are here stuttering out more excuses, while swearing that none of that happened

good on ya

[bluepete]

you said this.....




but, FACT:..... NONE of that happened

Golovkin did not " well beat " Canelo..... and you made a TON of lame excuses, INCLUDING AGE..... despite specifically promising not to

now you are here stuttering out more excuses, while swearing that none of that happened

good on ya

You seem to be the one stuttering because you keep repeating yourself. I think Golovkin won 7 to 5, so I think he did win well. It's subjective I know. He's age and the fact that aging effects everyone is something that you can't accept. It's got to be a factor in he's performance because that's the sport. If you have such a problem with what I wrote then you must be really disturbed by all the claims that Canelo destroys Golovkin right. I mean, I can make a case he won, nobody can make a case for those predictions. I havent swore to anything, I felt he'd win and feel he did. You've got a little thing going on with anyone who thinks he's won, "you guys" being anyone who don't see it your way. That's abit narcissistic.

[aboutfkntime]

You seem to be the one stuttering because you keep repeating yourself. I think Golovkin won 7 to 5, so I think he did win well. It's subjective I know. He's age and the fact that aging effects everyone is something that you can't accept. It's got to be a factor in he's performance because that's the sport. If you have such a problem with what I wrote then you must be really disturbed by all the claims that Canelo destroys Golovkin right. I mean, I can make a case he won, nobody can make a case for those predictions. I havent swore to anything, I felt he'd win and feel he did. You've got a little thing going on with anyone who thinks he's won, "you guys" being anyone who don't see it your way. That's abit narcissistic.

but, nothing has changed..... apart from your NEW excuses

FACT: you said that you would not make excuses

FACT: you made every excuse in the book

[aboutfkntime]

FACT: you said that you would not make excuses

FACT: you made every excuse in the book

FACT: post-history searching experts can be utter cvnts

[bluepete]

but, nothing has changed..... apart from your NEW excuses

FACT: you said that you would not make excuses

FACT: you made every excuse in the book

I told all my friends Whitaker would beat Chavez. It was a draw but Whitaker still beat Chavez in the real world. Same here, not as lopsided, but Golovkin still beat him for me and most judges. Nah, I think there are alot more excuses in the excuse book. Maybe ask these guys who predicted Golovkin gets destroyed. Like to hear them. What, you not interested in that? Only obsessed with me still?

[bluepete]

FACT: post-history searching experts can be utter cvnts

Only when they concentrate on certain opinions and not others. Not interested in those who said Golovkin gets destroyed? Wonder why? Did you think Canelo won? Did you think going in he'd win? Who did you think won the Jacobs fight? Questions questions..There are probably a lot more things that make you a cvnt than that, don't sell yourself short son..

[aboutfkntime]

Only when they concentrate on certain opinions and not others. Not interested in those who said Golovkin gets destroyed? Wonder why? Did you think Canelo won? Did you think going in he'd win? Who did you think won the Jacobs fight? Questions questions..There are probably a lot more things that make you a cvnt than that, don't sell yourself short son..

listen, you are starting to look pretty ****** here

Abel Sanchez was quoted.....

" Golovkin not slipping, opponents getting better "

so, you said this.....

I don't know why Sanchez word is suddenly being taken as gospel

so, I searched your post-history, to find the REAL gospel

Golovkin well beats Canelo, at any age. No excuses

FACT: you said that you would not make excuses
FACT: you made every excuse in the book

just saying

let's leave it there

[bluepete]

listen, you are starting to look pretty ****** here

Abel Sanchez was quoted.....

" Golovkin not slipping, opponents getting better "

so, you said this.....



so, I searched your post-history, to find the REAL gospel



FACT: you said that you would not make excuses
FACT: you made every excuse in the book

just saying

let's leave it there

You're the one looking ******. You keep repeating yourself despite the fact I've answered you. Golovkin retained he's title. Almost everyone saw him as the winner. No need for excuses, obviously he's opposition has got better, obviously he's also slipped at 35.Sanchez also said nobody lasts 12 with him at middle. Why is he's word now Gospel? No trainer says my champion is slipping while he has the title, it's ridiculous. You haven't answered my questions. Did you think. Canelo would and did win? Did you think Jacobs won? That you hate Golovkin is clear, the other stuff isn't. If you leave it there you're wimping out. You were interested enough to look back through my posts. Don't take an escape route now.

[aboutfkntime]

You're the one looking ******. You keep repeating yourself despite the fact I've answered you. Golovkin retained he's title. Almost everyone saw him as the winner. No need for excuses, obviously he's opposition has got better, obviously he's also slipped at 35.Sanchez also said nobody lasts 12 with him at middle. Why is he's word now Gospel? No trainer says my champion is slipping while he has the title, it's ridiculous. You haven't answered my questions. Did you think. Canelo would and did win? Did you think Jacobs won? That you hate Golovkin is clear, the other stuff isn't. If you leave it there you're wimping out. You were interested enough to look back through my posts. Don't take an escape route now.

good god you fkn moron, what more needs to be said ?

FACT: you said that you would not make excuses

FACT: you made every excuse in the book

now you are crawling up your own ass, to make more excuses

I will leave it there